-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please upgrade to fork of latest ganche-cli fork v0.6.7 #392
Comments
Apologies, I published the beta last night and am going to try installing at dydx this afternoon/evening. You should be able to use whatever ganache-core version works best then. Unless there are serious problems with the new version I might try to get away with not bumping testrpc-sc again - it's four forks that have to be synced with their upstream, re-hacked and then built together. Also WDYT about ganache-core 480? I'm kind of worried that will break anyone using gas estimation... |
No worries, that makes sense. This isn't a huge blocker as I am just running necessary tests outside of coverage. For the breaking change, I just now don't estimate gas in tests anymore, instead setting the gas amount to a static amount of 5mil or something. Coverage adds a lot of gas usage, so for that I bumped it to like 100 mil and had to make sure to run coverage with increased block size |
Out of curiosity, if testrpc-sc was republished with only the changes in ganache-core 460 would that work for you? i.e just bumping the eth-sig-util dep and changing the method signature there? I ask because I've taken a look at dydx/solo (it's amazing!) and it's clear you've blazed some new ground :) I'd kind of like to circle back towards the end of the 0.7.0 work and see if solidity-coverage's new API is well designed enough that it's components can be integrated into scripts like yours. At the moment it's just trying to work in a very vanilla Truffle context. |
I believe that's the main change that I'm looking for, yes! But again, I don't need that too badly (not blocking). You should focus on whatever is most impactful for 0.7.0 :) |
@BrendanChou |
Amazing, looks good and works |
Needed for certain tests to run such as those that use the latest eth_signTypedData rpc call
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: