-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for 5' 10X kits #13
Comments
Hi @youyupei , Thanks so much for the tool! We are currently using BLAZE as part of our nf-core/single-cell nanopore pipeline here: We are also looking for support for the 5' 10X to broaden the kits we support. We've forked this repo and begun work adding 5' support in that fork. Would you be interested in us submitting the PR here for review or if you would like to review in the forked repo itself I can add you? Thanks! |
Hi @atrull314, thanks for being interested in BLAZE. It would be great if you could submit PR for this. |
Thanks to @atrull314, I have merged @atrull314's PR to a new branch |
I tried this with data that was run a few days ago. It seems to work and I am showing below the results of 2 different basecalling methods:
A) Basecalling from MinKNOW, which gives (61.25% of all reads) with unambiguous polyT and adapter positions found So the dorado basecaller gives an extra 13% calling on this 5'GEX dataset. Thank you all involved in BLAZE and supporting the 5' 10X kits. |
Interesting project! We were looking at available longread tools that might be applicable to 10X 5' VDJ data - looks like BLAZE could be a good startpoint re-utilising modified
find_adaptor
code to identify the primer sequences used to enrich the VDJ sequences. Not a general solution to 5' 10X of courseThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: