Add pinToImmutable configuration

[shubham-stepsecurity]

@sailikhith-stepsecurity please review this pr!

[step-security-bot]

Please find StepSecurity AI-CodeWise code comments below.

Code Comments

testfiles/pinactions/output/donotpintoimmutable.yml

• [High]Avoid exposing secrets in code
  The authentication token used for the 'actions-yarn' step is being obtained from 'secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN'. This token must be kept secret, and should not be exposed in code. Use Github Actions' built-in secrets management (https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/encrypted-secrets) to securely store and access the authentication token.
• [Medium]Use specific version for dependencies
  The 'actions/checkout', 'github/codeql-action', and 'borales/actions-yarn' dependencies are being used without specifying a version. This means that the latest version of each dependency will be used. This can potentially introduce compatibility issues or break changes when new versions are released. Specify the exact version of each dependency being used, using a version number or git commit hash.

remediation/workflow/hardenrunner/addaction.go

• [High]Input validation
  The 'pinToImmutable' parameter is being used without any validation, which could allow an attacker to specify a path for local checkout and potentially read unintended files. Add validation by checking the value of 'pinToImmutable' parameter. This could involve checking the length and/or format of the value, or authenticating user permissions to pass the parameter. If the parameter is not valid, then throw an error and do not proceed with the action. For example, checking if pinToImmutable is a boolean data type would help in avoiding any malicious input to the parameter.
• [Medium]Use constant time comparison for sensitive strings
  The code is using a normal comparison for the 'HardenRunnerActionName' variable which is used to identify a sensitive action. This comparison could be subject to timing attacks or other malicious tampering, which would allow an attacker to execute the action without authorization. Use a constant time string comparison method, like the one provided by the 'crypto/subtle' package in Go. This will ensure that the comparison takes the same amount of time no matter the input and reduce the possibility of timing attacks. For example, you can replace 'action == HardenRunnerActionName' with 'subtle.ConstantTimeCompare([]byte(action), []byte(HardenRunnerActionName)) == 1'.
• [Medium]Use error handling instead of returning boolean values
  The function is using a boolean value to determine if the workflow was updated or not. This could lead to confusion and potential bugs in the calling code that relies on the boolean value to perform checks or decision-making. Also, the issues handled in the function could be detrimental to the application's data consistency and availability. Instead of returning a boolean value, handle the errors encountered while updating the workflow using Go's error handling syntax. This way, the calling code can appropriately handle the error by either retrying or informing the user. For example, replace 'return out, updated, nil' with 'return out, err' and adjust the return type of the function accordingly.
• [Low]Handle errors on PinAction
  The 'PinAction' function is being called with the assumption that it will always succeed because all the inputs required have already been validated. However, It would be best to safeguard the code by evaluating possible failure scenarios and responding appropriately. Handle any returned error from the 'PinAction' function and respond accordingly. An error could occur due to various reasons such as issues with the Git repo or insufficient permissions. For example, add 'if err != nil { return out, updated, err }' after the 'PinAction' function call.

remediation/workflow/pin/pinactions_test.go

• [High]Use constant-time string comparison to compare secrets
  Sensitive information such as credentials should not be compared with a regular string comparison because it introduces potential timing attacks. Hackers that carry out timed attacks can use the response time of a system to determine when there's a match with a tested variable. To mitigate such attacks, use a constant time comparison. In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined, replace the string comparison: "basic-auth-user-name" != username with subtle.ConstantTimeCompare([]byte(basic-auth-user-name), []byte(username)).
• [High]Do not store sensitive information in source code
  Sensitive information such as access credentials and API keys should not be stored in source code repositories. By leaving it in the repositories, it is exposed to the general public and to potential attackers, even if it is deleted later. Do not store access credentials or sensitive information in source code. You can store such sensitive data in environment variables or external secret storage solutions.
• [Medium]Validate input from third-party sources
  It is a good practice to validate external input, especially if it comes from third-party sources, to prevent attacks such as injection. Lack of input validation can lead to severe security risks like SQL injection, command injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS). In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined and the variable input is being handled, add input validation to ensure that the input data does not violate any business rules and it does not include malicious input. You can use packages such as input or validator to perform input validation.
• [Medium]Set content type values explicitly
  When working with HTTP requests and responses, it is good practice to set content type values explicitly to prevent malicious operations such as script injection and SQL injection. In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined, add an HTTP header to the outbound request,
  req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json").
• [Medium]Avoid hardcoded credentials
  It is a good practice to avoid hardcoding access credentials and other sensitive information directly in code. Hardcoded credentials may be inadvertently pushed to source control systems. In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined, remove any hardcoded credentials. Use environment variables, configuration files, or other mechanisms to securely store and retrieve secrets.
• [Medium]Avoid using default credentials
  It is a good practice to avoid using default credentials, as they can be easily exploited by attackers who possess knowledge of the default values. In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined, replace the default credentials with secure values.
• [Low]Minimize the use of third-party libraries and packages
  When using third-party libraries, ensure they are from trustworthy sources and are well-maintained. Limit the use of third-party libraries as much as possible to minimize the risk of security vulnerabilities. In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined, review the use of third-party libraries. Only use those libraries that are well-maintained, code-reviewed, and up-to-date. Avoid libraries with known security vulnerabilities.
• [Low]Remove debugging code
  Debugging code should not be introduced in production code. Such code can provide potential attackers with critical information about the system or may allow them to gain access that should not be given. In package tests, where the function TestPinActions() is being defined, remove debugging code such as Println statements.

remediation/workflow/secureworkflow_test.go

• [High]Do not log sensitive information
  The SecureWorkflow function logs the input parameter as part of an error message. Replace the logging statement with a generic error message.
• [Medium]Avoid negation in function names
  The SecureWorkflow function takes a boolean parameter with a negative name (notIncludeDev), which can lead to confusion. Rename the parameter to something like 'includeDev'.

remediation/workflow/secureworkflow.go

{
"recommendations": [
{
"severity": "High",
"recommendation": "Input validation of inputYaml parameter is missing.",
"description": "The inputYaml parameter is being used in the code without proper input validation, which could lead to injection vulnerabilities.",
"remediation": "Validate that inputYaml parameter is a valid YAML format string, and reject all other formats."
},
{
"severity": "High",
"recommendation": "Missing input validation of queryStringParams map.",
"description": "The queryStringParams map is being used in the code without proper input validation, which could lead to injection vulnerabilities.",
"remediation": "Validate that queryStringParams map values are safe and not malicious, such as by checking for special characters or encoding/decoding them. Also, ensure that keys and values meet any format requirements."
},
{
"severity": "Medium",
"recommendation": "Set pinToImmutable flag to true by default.",
"description": "The pinToImmutable flag is not set by default, which could lead to unintended consequences if it is not properly set. By setting it to true by default, it will make it more explicit in the code that this value is important and prevent accidental misconfigurations.",
"remediation": "Change the default value of pinToImmutable to true."
},
{
"severity": "Low",
"recommendation": "Unused addedPermissions variable.",
"description": "The addedPermissions variable is declared but never used in the code, which should be removed to reduce the chance of confusion and reduce code complexity.",
"remediation": "Remove the declaration and assignment of addedPermissions variable if it is not being used."
}
]
}

testfiles/pinactions/input/donotpintoimmutable.yml

• [High]Avoid using secrets directly in code and use secret management tools instead
  The code uses the GITHUB_TOKEN directly as a secret which is not a best practice. 1. Store the GITHUB_TOKEN in a safe and secure location such as Github secrets. 2. Access the secret by using the appropriate method or service when needed. For example, use Github actions secrets.3. Reference the secret, which is stored in an environment variable, using the appropriate syntax. For example, ${{secrets.MY_SECRET}}.
• [High]Remove sensitive information from code documentation and comments
  The code contains a comment that indicates sensitive information. Remove the comment containing the sensitive information.
• [Medium]Limit permissions and access to resources to the minimum necessary
  The code uses the GITHUB_TOKEN to access Github resources. 1. Limit permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN to the minimum necessary privileges and scopes. 2. Use a separate token for each type of resource that needs to be accessed, if possible. 3. Create a new Github bot account for automation and use this account's token instead of the personal or organizational GITHUB_TOKEN.
• [Medium]Validate user input
  The code does not validate inputs before using them. Implement appropriate input validation checks to ensure that user input meets expected standards. For example, check for valid input data types, range of values, and lengths.
• [Medium]Protect user input
  The code does not sanitize inputs before using them. Sanitize user input to protect against injection attacks such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. Use input validation libraries or built-in sanitization functions.
• [Low]Avoid using plain text protocols
  The code uses the http protocol to communicate with Github. Use more secure communication protocols such as https instead of http.
• [Low]Follow naming conventions
  The code uses a non-standard naming convention for the job name. Rename the job to use a naming convention that follows industry standards. For example, use camelCase for job names.
• [Low]Avoid hard-coding values
  The code uses the string 'ubuntu-latest' as the runs-on value. Use environment variables, configuration files, or parameterized inputs instead of hard-coding values.

main.go

• [High]Avoid ignoring error return from function calls
  Ignoring errors from a function can lead to unexpected behavior and difficult debugging. In this case, the function call to SecureWorkflow is not handling the error returned. Check the error returned by SecureWorkflow function to see if an error has been occurred. For example:

fixResponse, err := workflow.SecureWorkflow(httpRequest.QueryStringParameters, nil, false, inputYaml, dynamoDbSvc)
if err != nil {
  return nil, err
}

• [Medium]Use constant boolean values instead of the untyped boolean true or false for checked function calls arguments
  In this case, SecureWorkflow function expects a boolean argument for doValidation parameter, but this parameter is passed as an untyped boolean literal, making the code harder to read and the intention ambiguous. Change the parameter false in SecureWorkflow(httpRequest.QueryStringParameters, nil, false, inputYaml, dynamoDbSvc) to a named boolean constant with a meaningful name like doValidation=false.

remediation/workflow/hardenrunner/addaction_test.go

• [High]Make use of error handling and avoid silent failure
  In the TestAddAction function, the error returned on reading the test file is not handled and the test continues to run, thus leading to silent failure in case of any error. Handle any errors returned on file read and provide context of failure to the user. This can be done by logging the error and/or printing an error message indicating that the test file could not be read.
• [Medium]Follow Test Driven Development principles
  The use of t.Fatalf in the TestAddAction function indicates that the tests are written after the code in order to verify its functionality. This is against TDD principles which require the tests to be written first. Follow TDD principles and write the tests first. This will ensure that the function being tested is properly validated and that errors are detected early in the development cycle.
• [Medium]Avoid Hardcoding
  The fourth parameter to the AddAction() function is hardcoded to false. This could cause issues if the function signatures were to change in the future. Instead of hardcoding the fourth parameter, consider using a constant value or a configuration file parameter.
• [Low]Use more explicit variable names for enhanced readability
  The naming of the variables got and gotUpdated can be confusing to someone that is not familiar with the code and context. Use more descriptive and explicit variable names that convey a clear meaning to the reader. For example, receivedOutput instead of got and wasUpdated instead of gotUpdated.

remediation/workflow/pin/pinactions.go

• [High]Avoid exposing sensitive data to log files
  The code logs sensitive information such as workflow YAML, pinned versions, or Github workflow URLs, which may compromise the security of the system. Sensitive data should never be logged or written to any output stream since it can be easily read by unauthorized users. Instead, such information should be stored in secure storage or transmitted through secure channels.
• [High]Ensure that literals that are used to construct queries are properly sanitized
  The 'inputYaml' parameter is passed to 'yaml.Unmarshal' without proper validation, which may lead to SQL injection attacks. The input string should be validated using a regular expression before being passed to any sensitive function. Alternatively, you should consider using a parameterized query such as golang's 'database/sql' package.
• [High]Ensure that user input is properly validated before processing it
  The 'exemptedActions' parameter is used without proper validation, allowing any user to specify any action that can be pinned irrespective of its security level. The input string should be validated using a regular expression before being passed to any sensitive function. In addition, you should consider restricting the types of actions that can be allowed to ensure that only secure actions are pinned.
• [Medium]Ensure that data is not leaked to an attacker deliberately or inadvertently through the generation of an error message
  The 'err' returned by 'yaml.Unmarshal' can leak sensitive information to an attacker, such as the location of the failing piece of code or the contents of the file being parsed. Error messages should be generic and not contain any sensitive data such as filenames or paths. The error message should describe the error condition in a general sense without providing any key data that could aid an attacker.
• [Medium]Ensure that input validation is enforced strictly and that malformed inputs are rejected
  The step 'Uses' field is not validated, which may lead to command injection vulnerabilities. All user-generated input, such as the command to be run, should be checked for validity and sanitized accordingly. Make sure that any input not following expected patterns is rejected before any further processing occurs.
• [Low]Ensure that sessions are properly invalidated
  The session is not invalidated after completion of the PinActions function, which may leave the session open and vulnerable to attacks. Sessions should be invalidated as soon as they are no longer needed. In addition, it would be best if you considered using timeouts and other mechanisms to limit session duration.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us improve the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on this comment. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. If you have questions or detailed feedback, please create n GitHub issue in StepSecurity/AI-CodeWise.

[sailikhith-stepsecurity]

Not sure if we need to add a flag check here. If the action is already immutable, Do we still need to pin it using sha ?
If yes, what we have now works.
If not, we would be pinning the actions that are already immutable.

[step-security-bot]

Please find StepSecurity AI-CodeWise code comments below.

Code Comments

main.go

• [High]Parameter Validation
  The code is passing 'nil' as the second parameter to the 'SecureWorkflow' function which expects a non-nil value. This can cause a null pointer exception at runtime and may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack if an attacker can pass input that causes the function to crash. Always validate the input parameters before passing them to the function and handle the error appropriately. In this case, the inputYaml parameter should be validated before passing it to the 'SecureWorkflow' function.
• [Medium]Error Handling
  The 'SecureWorkflow' function can return an error but the code does not handle it properly. This can cause the application to crash or behave unexpectedly if an error occurs. Always handle the errors returned by functions and APIs. In this case, the error returned by the 'SecureWorkflow' function should be handled appropriately by logging, retrying, or returning an error response to the client.

remediation/workflow/secureworkflow_test.go

• [High]Use secure coding practices when handling sensitive data
  Sensitive data processing should follow the principles of secure coding guidelines such as OWASP Top Ten, NIST, CERT, etc. Change the implementation to follow secure coding practices for sensitive data processing.
• [Medium]Avoid using mock objects for security-sensitive methods
  Mock objects can bypass security measures and cause security vulnerabilities. Replace the mock object and use real objects for security-sensitive methods.
• [Medium]Implement error handling with care
  Error handling should be in place, but error values and messages should not reveal sensitive information about the system. Implement error handling with the appropriate care and attention and avoid having error messages that can divulge sensitive data.

testfiles/pinactions/output/donotpintoimmutable.yml

• [High]Secrets should not be hardcoded in the code. Use a vault or environment variables instead
  The GitHub token is hardcoded in the code and can be seen by anyone with access to the code. This could potentially lead to unauthorized access to resources. Instead of hardcoding the token, use an environment variable or a secrets vault like HashiCorp Vault. You could use GitHub's built-in secrets feature to store the token securely.
• [Medium]Specify the exact version of the checkout action to ensure stability and predictability
  The checkout action is not using an exact version but a commit hash. This means that the action could potentially break if there is a change in the API or functionality. Use an exact version of the checkout action by specifying the version number or a version range. This will ensure that the same version is used in all builds and prevent potential breakage.
• [Low]Pin the GitHub package registry URL to a specific version to ensure stability and predictability
  The GitHub package registry URL is not pinned to a specific version, which could lead to instability and potential breakage if the URL changes or is deprecated. Use a specific version of the GitHub package registry URL instead of the latest version to ensure that the same URL is used in all builds and prevent potential breakage.

remediation/workflow/pin/pinactions_test.go

• [High]Avoid using hardcoded configurations in code. Store configurations and secrets outside the codebase or use tools provided by your platform to securely store such information
  There is a hardcoded API URL in the code. This can lead to a risk of information disclosure as the API URL can act as a clue for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities or try to gain unauthorized access. Store this information outside of the codebase, such as in configuration files or environment variables.
• [High]Avoid hard coding secrets like API keys and access tokens directly into code. Instead obfuscate them or use secure key management systems provided by your platform
  The code contains an access token which is hard coded. This can lead to the risk of compromising these tokens by attackers who can use them to gain unauthorized access or perform malicious activities. Use a secure key management system to store and manage such tokens, or obfuscate them to minimize the risk of exposure.
• [High]Follow the principle of least privilege while setting up user permissions
  There is a hardcoded value that implies a higher privilege level for a user, such as owner of a repository. This could lead to additional vulnerabilities being exposed by allowing more access than necessary. Use the minimum privilege level necessary for the user role to ensure that users have access to the necessary information and features without exposing potential vulnerabilities.
• [Medium]Always validate all input data provided by users or external services to prevent injection attacks
  The code doesn't appear to validate the input data for the URL in RegisterResponder method of httpmock package. Validate all input data being passed in, including from external sources, before accepting it as legitimate to minimize the risk of an injection attack.
• [Medium]Properly constrain access to API Keys
  The access token used in the code can have unrestricted access if compromised, increasing the risk of the entire environment being compromised. Restrict the access level of tokens to only the areas required to minimize the damage if the token is compromised.
• [Low]Use a data structure or JSON schema to improve readability and maintainability of code
  The hardcoded JSON array in TestPinActions is hard to read and maintain. Use a data structure or JSON schema to formalize the structure of the JSON array and improve readability and maintainability of the code.

remediation/workflow/secureworkflow.go

• [High]Do not use 'interface{}' as function argument or return type
  Function arguments and return types with no fixed type are a security risk that should be avoided. Replace params ...interface{} with a specific parameter type or a struct that contains all of the parameters if their types are different.
• [High]Do not use 'interface{}' as parameter value
  Function arguments with a type of 'interface{}' can be a security risk that should be avoided. If possible, change the values passed as params to specific types. Use 'interface{}' only when it can't be avoided.
• [High]Do not pin to commits
  Pinning to a commit rather than a branch can create security risks since pinned code may miss important security fixes. Pin to a branch instead of a commit
• [High]Validate user input received via queryStringParams
  Unvalidated user input can lead to security issues such as SQL injection attacks. Add input validation to ensure that queryStringParams only contains expected values.
• [High]Validate user input received via exemptedActions
  Unvalidated user input can lead to security issues such as injection attacks. Add input validation to ensure that exemptedActions only contains expected values.
• [Medium]Reduce the scope of variables
  Variables with a large scope can create security risks, e.g., if they are accidentally modified or read by other parts of the code. Modify the code to reduce the scope of exemptedActions and pinToImmutable variables.
• [Medium]Do not use '_' as a blank identifier
  Using '' as a blank identifier can lead to errors or code that is difficult to understand. Replace '' with a descriptive identifier that accurately reflects the variable's purpose.
• [Low]Avoid using multiple returns in one line
  Returning multiple values in one line can create readability and maintainability issues in the code. Move each return value to a separate line.
• [Low]Simplify boolean conditions
  Complex boolean conditions can create readability issues in the code. Simplify boolean conditions using truth tables, logical equivalences, or other techniques to improve readability.
• [Low]Use named variables for package-scoped variables
  Using named variables helps improve maintainability of code. Replace calls to '_ = pinnedAction || pinnedDocker' with 'pinned := pinnedAction || pinnedDocker'.

testfiles/pinactions/input/donotpintoimmutable.yml

• [High]Sensitive data exposure
  Github token stored as plain text in the YAML file. Store the Github token as a Secret and use it as an environment variable in the workflow.
• [High]Insecure credential storage
  The Github token should not be stored in clear text as it can be easily exposed. Use Github's Secret feature to encrypt and store sensitive data such as authentication tokens.
• [Medium]Use the latest version of dependencies
  The workflow is using version 1 of the actions/checkout@v1 instead of the latest version. Update the checkout action to the latest version using actions/checkout@v2.
• [Medium]Unused dependencies
  The [email protected] dependency is not used in the workflow. Remove the [email protected] dependency if it is not needed in the workflow.
• [Low]Use a consistent syntax
  The YAML file uses both single and double quotes in the workflow. Use a consistent type of quotes throughout the YAML file.

remediation/workflow/hardenrunner/addaction.go

• [High]Ensure that function parameters are validated to prevent a potential code injection attack. (OWASP-VALIDATOR-002)
  The 'AddAction' function in the provided patch accepts 'inputYaml' and 'action' strings as parameters without validating whether they are being used in a way they were intended. This can lead to security issues such as code injection attacks when unsanitized user input is included in these strings, or cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities when the 'action' is saved and executed by other users. Add input validation to the function parameters. Use escaping or encoding of untrusted data before it is included in the strings. This can be done with built-in encoding functions or using a third-party library like 'html/template' or 'encoding/json'. Also, add data flow tracking throughout the codebase to ensure the proper use of unsanitized user input.
• [Medium]Ensure that proper error checking and handling is implemented for YAML unmarshaling. (GOLANG-ERRHAND-001)
  The 'AddAction' function uses the 'yaml.Unmarshal' method to parse YAML data. The method returns an error when the input is not valid or correctly formatted. However, the error is not properly checked and handled, which can lead to unexpected behavior or security vulnerabilities. Check for and handle errors in the 'AddAction' function after the invocation of the 'yaml.Unmarshal' method. Use the 'errors' package to provide informative error messages and context for debugging.
• [Medium]Implement appropriate access controls while using a third-party library. (OWASP-ASVS-013)
  The 'PinAction' function used in the 'AddAction' function is a third-party library that performs git operations. There may be certain privileges or permissions granted to users based on the actions performed by the library, which can be exploited to gain unauthorized access or execute arbitrary code. Implement proper privilege separation and access controls while using the 'PinAction' function. Perform a security review of the library to understand the risks and impact of using it in the codebase.
• [Low]Use constants or enums instead of hard-coding string values. (GOLANG-CONST-001)
  The 'HardenRunnerActionName' variable in the provided patch is a string literal that is used as a reference for a certain value throughout the codebase. Hard-coded strings can be error-prone and difficult to maintain. Declare a constant value or an enum for the 'HardenRunnerActionName' variable. This ensures that the reference can be updated in one place, and the change is propagated throughout the codebase.

remediation/workflow/hardenrunner/addaction_test.go

• [High]Prevent OS command injection
  The function AddAction() can be used by an attacker to inject Operating System (OS) commands resulting in a command injection vulnerability. Use a secure method to execute shell commands, such as passing commands and arguments using an array of strings directly to the command executor. Example would be to use the execCommand object
• [Medium]Handle errors gracefully and securely
  The function TestAddAction() doesn't handle the error checking of the function AddAction() gracefully and securely. Handle the error by either logging or printing an error message, then exit or return gracefully. Use defer statements to properly handle the cleanup of resources.
• [Medium]Sanitize user-supplied inputs
  The function AddAction() doesn't sanitize the input parameters, which can lead to vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Sanitize user-supplied input by stripping out HTML and other special characters from the input data using a sanitization library or regular expression.
• [Low]Avoid code duplication
  The function AddAction() has repeating code that can be refactored to reduce duplication and improve maintainability. Refactor the common code into a separate function, then call that function in both places.

remediation/workflow/pin/pinactions.go

• [High]Do not default pin actions/dependencies to a mutable SHA-1 of their git repository when a semantic version is available
  The current implementation defaults to pinning the version of an action to its mutable SHA-1 which could be a security risk instead of using a semantic versioning scheme. This can result in the usage of an action that is technically backward-compatible but may have critical security vulnerabilities. Pinning actions/dependencies to a loose semantic versioning scheme instead of mutable SHA-1 of the repository.
• [High]Check for the presence of sensitive information hardcoded in code
  The current codebase might contain sensitive information hardcoded which increases security risks such as credentials, keys, and other secrets plain text. Remove hardcoded sensitive information and move them to Environment Variables.
• [Medium]Use constant-time comparison instead of regular comparison to compare the contents of two strings
  It's highly suggested to use constant-time comparison instead of regular == operator for comparing two strings. The current implementation does not compare the contents of two strings using a constant-time comparison, which may result in a vulnerability called timing-attack. Use a constant-time comparison function such as crypto/subtle's Compare.
• [Low]Add commenting and maintainability improvements
  The current implementation could benefit from adding more comments in the code to explain the logic of some parts better. Also, there are some variables and functions names that be improved to make the code more readable and maintainable. Add more commenting and improve the names of variables and functions for better readability.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us improve the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on this comment. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. If you have questions or detailed feedback, please create n GitHub issue in StepSecurity/AI-CodeWise.