You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
The problem with this solution is that the test reporting is very verbose since it creates new check runs for the PR.
When there are failed tests, the PR will be marked failing even in cases where the tests pass in a later retry.
Original Issue: apache#16736
Is your enhancement request related to a problem? Please describe.
We are currently using a test reporting solution based on https://github.com/dorny/test-reporter and there's a copy of this action in https://github.com/apache/pulsar-test-infra/tree/master/test-reporter .
The problem with this solution is that the test reporting is very verbose since it creates new check runs for the PR.
When there are failed tests, the PR will be marked failing even in cases where the tests pass in a later retry.
Describe the solution you'd like
There's an alternative solution in https://github.com/mikepenz/action-junit-report which is actively maintained.
It's possible to use this action with
annotate_only: 'true'
so that check runs aren't created at all. This is to mitigate the gap in GitHub Actions solution that check results cannot target a specific workflow when there are multiple active ones (more details in mikepenz/action-junit-report#40 (comment)).The action will create a report for each build job using a new method available in GitHub Actions. example: https://github.com/mikepenz/action-junit-report/actions/runs/2717236074#summary-7464569272
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: