-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename ierr and serr #167
Comments
I totally agree. Once a public release is made, making this change could be extremely disruptive. I think the change should be made in conjunction with #119. It should be unambiguous where |
On this same topic. I believe that
Similar functionality exists in the Incidentally, this is pretty similar to the typical usage of fortran wrappers to PETSc |
@tjfulle Sounds good! I'll try to do that while you are working on testing. |
What would you think about making a |
I don't know how I feel about getter/setter methods. I guess I would need to see an example of how it would be used and weigh against current use. |
I was just thinking of how to reduce global data. |
@tjfulle Can you give an example of how the code would look like? Another thing right now is that the use of |
Excuse the formatting, written on my phone from a ski lift
|
@tjfulle This is the best thing I saw on github ever! |
Back again! To expand a bit, I prefer limiting access to module wide variable through public module procedures. The macro |
Feel free to update #169 with your ideas. Once you have a working prototype, I'll see if I can massage SWIG to work together with it. |
@aprokop define |
For the most part, fixed in #169. |
Leaving them unprefixed will lead to collisions. This also does not follow xSDK policies. They should be renamed to something like
fortrilinos_ierr
andfortrilinos_serr
instead.@sethrj @tjfulle @kevans32 Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: