Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency core-js to v3.22.0 #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2022
Merged

Update dependency core-js to v3.22.0 #81

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 15, 2022

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
core-js 3.21.1 -> 3.22.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

zloirock/core-js

v3.22.0

Compare Source

  • Change Array by copy proposal:
    • Moved to Stage 3, March TC39 meeting
    • Disabled forced replacement and added /actual/ entry points for methods from this proposal
    • Array.prototype.toSpliced throws a TypeError instead of RangeError if the result length is more than MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, proposal-change-array-by-copy/70
  • Added some more atob / btoa fixes:
    • NodeJS <17.9 atob does not ignore spaces, node/42530
    • Actual NodeJS atob does not validate encoding, node/42646
    • FF26- implementation does not properly convert argument to string
    • IE / Edge <16 implementation have wrong arity
  • Added /full/ namespace as the replacement for /features/ since it's more descriptive in context of the rest namespaces (/es//stable//actual//full/)
  • Avoided propagation of removed parts of proposals to upper stages. For example, %TypedArray%.prototype.groupBy was removed from the Array grouping proposal a long time ago. We can't completely remove this method since it's a breaking change. But this proposal has been promoted to stage 3 - so the proposal should be promoted without this method, this method should not be available in /actual/ entries - but it should be available in early-stage entries to avoid breakage.
  • Significant internal refactoring and splitting of modules (but without exposing to public API since it will be a breaking change - it will be exposed in the next major version)
  • Bug fixes:
    • Fixed work of non-standard V8 Error features with wrapped Error constructors, #​1061
    • null and undefined allowed as the second argument of structuredClone, #​1056
  • Tooling:
    • Stabilized proposals are filtered out from the core-js-compat -> core-js-builder -> core-js-bundle output. That mean that if the output contains, for example, es.object.has-own, the legacy reference to it, esnext.object.has-own, no longer added.
    • Aligned modules filters of core-js-builder and core-js-compat, now it's modules and exclude options
    • Added support of entry points, modules, regexes, and arrays of them to those filters
    • Missed targets option of core-js-compat means that the targets filter just will not be applied, so the result will contain modules required for all possible engines
  • Compat data:
    • .stack property on DOMException marked as supported from Deno 1.15
    • Added Deno 1.21 compat data mapping
    • Added Electron 19.0 and updated 18.0 compat data mapping
    • Added Samsung Internet 17.0 compat data mapping
    • Added Opera Android 68 compat data mapping

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from Clivern as a code owner April 15, 2022 04:23
@Clivern Clivern merged commit dab1f66 into main Apr 15, 2022
@Clivern Clivern deleted the renovate/core-js-3.x branch April 15, 2022 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants