Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(apm): use tagger ProcessID resolution #34153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

wdhif
Copy link
Member

@wdhif wdhif commented Feb 18, 2025

What does this PR do?

Migrate the ProcessID resolution for APM to the tagger module.

Motivation

This is done to ensure consistency in Origin Detection behavior across Datadog Products.

Describe how you validated your changes

QA is done by unit and E2E tests but I also checked manually

  • With a modified library (process_id_only) that does not send any container information:
image

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

None.

Additional Notes

N/A

@github-actions github-actions bot added short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-apm trace-agent labels Feb 18, 2025
@wdhif wdhif added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Feb 18, 2025
@wdhif wdhif added this to the 7.64.0 milestone Feb 18, 2025
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 1e6393f8-569f-4f01-ac96-451fce5a5865

Baseline: 7a8951c
Comparison: a2a7c22
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +2.11 [-1.00, +5.22] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.89 [+0.81, +0.97] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.60 [-0.29, +1.48] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.26 [-0.20, +0.72] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.04 [-0.82, +0.91] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.82, +0.86] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.28, +0.31] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.87, +0.87] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.00 [-0.06, +0.06] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.02, +0.02] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.65, +0.64] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.80, +0.77] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.03 [-0.10, +0.04] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.66, +0.60] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.06 [-0.83, +0.71] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.23 [-0.26, -0.19] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@wdhif wdhif force-pushed the CONTP-588/wassim-dhif/apm-pid-resolution branch from 3a5c8bf to a2a7c22 Compare February 18, 2025 13:54
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 7a8951c3e3d96f7e948c20c72a97561b96970e44

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 41.36MB 41.36MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 41.44MB 41.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 41.44MB 41.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 39.62MB 39.62MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 61.80MB 61.80MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 61.87MB 61.87MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 61.87MB 61.87MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.05MB 59.05MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.12MB 59.12MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.00MB 864.85MB 864.86MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -0.00MB 855.10MB 855.11MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.01MB 876.40MB 876.41MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -0.01MB 876.40MB 876.41MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -0.01MB 866.63MB 866.64MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb -0.01MB 443.29MB 443.30MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=56149982 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit a2a7c22

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 838.39MiB 847.49MiB 202.3MiB 212.83MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 827.24MiB 836.66MiB 182.31MiB 192.17MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 838.39MiB 858.45MiB 205.78MiB 214.3MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 827.33MiB 836.66MiB 184.27MiB 194.46MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 838.28MiB 858.45MiB 205.78MiB 214.3MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 827.36MiB 836.66MiB 184.27MiB 194.46MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 39.52MiB 49.7MiB 10.54MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 37.86MiB 48.1MiB 9.12MiB 19.1MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 39.52MiB 49.7MiB 10.55MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 39.52MiB 49.7MiB 10.55MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.01MiB 69.0MiB 14.83MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.39MiB 66.4MiB 12.78MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.01MiB 69.0MiB 14.85MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.39MiB 66.4MiB 12.82MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.01MiB 69.0MiB 14.85MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 922.65MiB 931.7MiB 308.51MiB 318.67MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 934.97MiB 944.08MiB 292.53MiB 303.0MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.09GiB 1.1GiB 383.64MiB 393.75MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.1GiB 1.1GiB 363.63MiB 373.71MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 47.67MiB 57.88MiB 18.25MiB 28.29MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 46.05MiB 56.27MiB 17.01MiB 27.06MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.78MiB 277.7MiB 106.28MiB 117.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.81MiB 293.73MiB 101.12MiB 112.12MiB

@wdhif wdhif marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2025 15:31
@wdhif wdhif requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2025 15:31
}
assert.Equal(t, containerID, provider.GetContainerID(req.Context(), req.Header))
})

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe replace this test with the new logic? What other coverage exists for the change?

Copy link
Member Author

@wdhif wdhif Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ichinaski 👋

The tests regarding Origin Detection have been moved to the tagger: https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/blob/main/comp/core/tagger/impl/local_tagger_test.go#L166-L176

What could also be done in the future is to split the GetContainerID() methods into ParseOriginInfo() and GetContainerID() that way we could have unit tests regarding the context and HTTP header parsing done by the Trace Agent.

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Feb 19, 2025
@wdhif wdhif requested a review from ichinaski February 19, 2025 10:03
@wdhif wdhif modified the milestones: 7.64.0, 7.65.0 Feb 19, 2025
@wdhif
Copy link
Member Author

wdhif commented Feb 24, 2025

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 24, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-02-24 12:46:03 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-02-24 12:46:07 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 30m.


2025-02-24 13:11:21 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit c3c41e6 into main Feb 24, 2025
240 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the CONTP-588/wassim-dhif/apm-pid-resolution branch February 24, 2025 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-apm trace-agent
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants