-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 426
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(debugging): add RESUME to functions generated by DSL #6835
Merged
P403n1x87
merged 3 commits into
DataDog:1.x
from
P403n1x87:chore/debugger-dsl-make-function
Sep 14, 2023
Merged
chore(debugging): add RESUME to functions generated by DSL #6835
P403n1x87
merged 3 commits into
DataDog:1.x
from
P403n1x87:chore/debugger-dsl-make-function
Sep 14, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues.
db087de
to
aa6e9a6
Compare
shatzi
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2023
18 tasks
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [ ] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [ ] This PR doesn't touch any of that. (cherry picked from commit af986f7)
18 tasks
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [ ] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [ ] This PR doesn't touch any of that. (cherry picked from commit af986f7)
18 tasks
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [ ] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [ ] This PR doesn't touch any of that. (cherry picked from commit af986f7)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [ ] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [ ] This PR doesn't touch any of that. (cherry picked from commit af986f7)
18 tasks
16 tasks
P403n1x87
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2023
…1.19] (#6909) Backport af986f7 from #6835 to 1.19. We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [x] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [x] This PR doesn't touch any of that. Co-authored-by: Gabriele N. Tornetta <[email protected]>
P403n1x87
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2023
…1.18] (#6908) Backport af986f7 from #6835 to 1.18. We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) - [x] If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. - [x] This PR doesn't touch any of that. Co-authored-by: Gabriele N. Tornetta <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog
A changelog entry is not required for this PR.
Dynamic Instrumentation
Dynamic Instrumentation/Live Debugger
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We add a RESUME instructions to the functions generated by the compilation of DI expressions. Whilst this does not seem to cause problems with CPython 3.11, early tests show that this is more of an issue with CPython 3.12. Therefore, we make this change to prevent any potential future issues.
Checklist
changelog/no-changelog
.Reviewer Checklist
@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance
.