✨ webserver-catalog rpc connection

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR exposes an rpc interface in the catalog and uses it in the webserver.

catalog

• setup rabbitmq
• ✨ new rcp server
  • implemented with fakes until coming PR

webserver's catalog plugin

• _rpc client
• _api module (service layer):
  - get catalog _rpc results and aggregates i/o
• rest _handlers (controller layer)
  - implemented using _api

Related issue/s

• Part of Front-end uses new catalog/services/* web API entrypoint #5964

How to test

• tests rest entrypoints mocking catalog's _rpc client calls

cd services/web/server/
make install-dev
pytest -vv tests/unit/with_dbs/01/test_catalog_handlers__services.py:test_dev_get_and_patch_service

Dev-ops checklist

• catalog service now interacts with rabbitmq. Added RABBITMQ_ related env-vars. No changes required in osparc-ops!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.95298% with 48 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.8%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (7987fe3).
Report is 313 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #6003      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    84.5%   87.8%    +3.2%     
=========================================
  Files          10    1425    +1415     
  Lines         214   58451   +58237     
  Branches       25    1396    +1371     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   51359   +51178     
- Misses         23    6798    +6775     
- Partials       10     294     +284     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.8% <30.4%> (?)
unittests	85.9% <84.9%> (+1.3%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...src/models_library/api_schemas_catalog/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...src/models_library/api_schemas_catalog/services.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...els_library/api_schemas_invitations/invitations.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...pi_schemas_resource_usage_tracker/pricing_plans.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...rc/models_library/api_schemas_webserver/catalog.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...ls_library/api_schemas_webserver/projects_nodes.py	96.9% <100.0%> (ø)
...ls_library/api_schemas_webserver/projects_ports.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...s/models-library/src/models_library/invitations.py	76.9% <100.0%> (ø)
...ages/models-library/src/models_library/payments.py	93.1% <100.0%> (ø)
...dels-library/src/models_library/projects_access.py	96.5% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 30 more

... and 1353 files with indirect coverage changes

[GitHK]

Looking good, please adjust the code to our current convention for defining the RPC endpoints

[sanderegg]

Looks good but please change the call back to is_old_service, maybe by adding a comment for it. thanks!

[bisgaard-itis]

Cool, thanks a lot. I have a few questions (mostly for my understanding) below.