Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SBO terms #667

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Sep 3, 2022
Merged

Add SBO terms #667

merged 21 commits into from
Sep 3, 2022

Conversation

stelmo
Copy link
Collaborator

@stelmo stelmo commented Sep 3, 2022

SBO is a systematic naming convention. We should use it to look for reactions instead of guessing based on naming. Right now just add the ontology and a few is_xxx functions, but for 2.0 I propose to only using sbo terms in functions like find_exchange_reactions. This removes the footgun of assuming find_xxx is robust (it isn't because it depends on looks_like)

@stelmo stelmo marked this pull request as draft September 3, 2022 10:51
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #667 (7db2516) into develop (6aaa6bb) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 90.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #667      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    91.01%   91.00%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files           81       82       +1     
  Lines         2004     2012       +8     
===========================================
+ Hits          1824     1831       +7     
- Misses         180      181       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/COBREXA.jl 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/envelopes.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/flux_balance_analysis.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/flux_variability_analysis.jl 93.54% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/gecko.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/max_min_driving_force.jl 93.33% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/minimize_metabolic_adjustment.jl 66.66% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/modifications/crowding.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/modifications/generic.jl 77.27% <ø> (ø)
src/analysis/modifications/knockout.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 65 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@stelmo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

stelmo commented Sep 3, 2022

/format

triggered by @stelmo on PR #667
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2022

✔️ Auto-formatting triggered by this comment succeeded, commited as 968804b

@stelmo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

stelmo commented Sep 3, 2022

/format

@stelmo stelmo requested a review from exaexa September 3, 2022 13:42
@stelmo stelmo marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2022 13:42
triggered by @stelmo on PR #667
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2022

✔️ Auto-formatting triggered by this comment succeeded, commited as 3855710

@stelmo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

stelmo commented Sep 3, 2022

/format

triggered by @stelmo on PR #667
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2022

✔️ Auto-formatting triggered by this comment succeeded, commited as 52ecb09

@stelmo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

stelmo commented Sep 3, 2022

/format

triggered by @stelmo on PR #667
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2022

✔️ Auto-formatting triggered by this comment succeeded, commited as aade33c

@stelmo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

stelmo commented Sep 3, 2022

/format

triggered by @stelmo on PR #667
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2022

✔️ Auto-formatting triggered by this comment succeeded, commited as 7db2516

Copy link
Collaborator

@exaexa exaexa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@stelmo stelmo merged commit bb91109 into develop Sep 3, 2022
@stelmo stelmo deleted the mo-sbo branch September 3, 2022 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants