-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
extensible variable semantics #735
Conversation
6e8d79d
to
c00e228
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lg2m
Codecov ReportBase: 90.33% // Head: 89.38% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #735 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.33% 89.38% -0.96%
==========================================
Files 81 82 +1
Lines 2008 2053 +45
==========================================
+ Hits 1814 1835 +21
- Misses 194 218 +24
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
@stelmo there are some TODOs before I can merge this, but the API for variables is final. I'll do the constraint APIs in a separate PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really good work
1d840d2
to
efb6ed8
Compare
164008c
to
17958d0
Compare
76332a2
to
add7fee
Compare
add7fee
to
4e2478a
Compare
Not really working yet, but this should clear the current mess in variables vs. reactions vs. fluxes vs. enzymes vs. mass groups vs. whatnot.