Remove unnecessary docstrings

[stelmo]

Some docstrings are not necessary (especially generic inherited methods). Remove them

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 88.49% // Head: 88.49% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (e259c18) compared to base (33eef00).
Patch coverage: 75.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next     #754   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.49%   88.49%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines        2103     2103           
=======================================
  Hits         1861     1861           
  Misses        242      242           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/types/accessors/AbstractMetabolicModel.jl	77.61% <ø> (ø)
src/types/models/BalancedGrowthCommunityModel.jl	98.21% <ø> (ø)
src/types/models/JSONModel.jl	99.01% <0.00%> (ø)
src/types/models/ObjectModel.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/types/models/SBMLModel.jl	92.08% <ø> (ø)
src/types/models/Serialized.jl	88.88% <ø> (ø)
src/types/wrappers/EnzymeConstrainedModel.jl	92.68% <ø> (ø)
src/types/wrappers/MatrixCoupling.jl	89.47% <ø> (ø)
src/types/wrappers/MaxMinDrivingForceModel.jl	95.77% <ø> (ø)
...types/wrappers/SimplifiedEnzymeConstrainedModel.jl	66.66% <ø> (ø)
... and 2 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[stelmo]

Not sure if this is better or worse. Also not sure why ?reaction_stoichiometry still displays for MatrixModelWithCoupling

[stelmo]

All docstrings removed, but where appropriate I added information to the model constructors to make it clearer where the accessors might surprise people

[exaexa]

a good 🪓