Update govuk-frontend to 5.4.0 #31
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for this contribution @BenLambertNcl much appreciated! I'm going to take it into a different branch so I can add to it. We want to keep the v1.x.x releases of HMLR Frontend compatible with the v4.x.x releases of GOV.UK Frontend. Your changes will be the first of a new v2.x.x release of HMLR Frontend which is compatible with v5.x.x releases of GOV.UK Frontend. Just want to make sure people are aware when upgrading that the major version change is reflected in our own package too. Cheers 👍🏻 |
matthew-shaw
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes in this MR:
govuk-frontendto version 5.4.0See https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-frontend/releases for the full changelogs for 5.0.0-5.4.0.
N.B.: I have updated the changelog, but left the changes in "unreleased", as I was unsure if release candidate versions would be needed