-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document speed comparison #2072
Conversation
|
memory parity will be separate PR as it has to be developed first... 🐰 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2072 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 93% 93%
======================================
Files 134 134
Lines 9928 9928
======================================
Hits 9242 9242
Misses 686 686 |
config with k80 for MNIST dataset training on 15 epochs
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you need further help see our docs: https://pytorch-lightning.readthedocs.io/en/latest/CONTRIBUTING.html#pull-request or ask the assistance of a core contributor here or on Slack. Thank you for your contributions. |
Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have the feeling this does not fit into the "best practices" section. But there are not many other options. Maybe @edenlightning has a good idea? :)
maybe @SeanNaren wants to include his ddp benchmarking results here too? :) I've seen some great charts somewhere |
I think we can move it anytime, I just need this as base for memory benchmark :]
that would be great, so another PR? |
* docs * script * dump * desc * import * import * if * norm * t * finished * isort * typing Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]> * xlabel * pandas * time Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
* docs * script * dump * desc * import * import * if * norm * t * finished * isort * typing Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]> * xlabel * pandas * time Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
* docs * script * dump * desc * import * import * if * norm * t * finished * isort * typing Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]> * xlabel * pandas * time Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
* docs * script * dump * desc * import * import * if * norm * t * finished * isort * typing Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]> * xlabel * pandas * time Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
* docs * script * dump * desc * import * import * if * norm * t * finished * isort * typing Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]> * xlabel * pandas * time Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
* docs * script * dump * desc * import * import * if * norm * t * finished * isort * typing Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]> * xlabel * pandas * time Co-authored-by: Nicki Skafte <[email protected]>
What does this PR do?
Extend documentation on how the Pl is running almost the same fast as vanilla PT
Follow-up from #1587
PR review
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.
Did you have fun?
Make sure you had fun coding 🙃