Skip to content

Avoid Ee := EWcbvEval module aliases which result in ugly extraction … #2677

Avoid Ee := EWcbvEval module aliases which result in ugly extraction …

Avoid Ee := EWcbvEval module aliases which result in ugly extraction … #2677

Triggered via pull request February 15, 2024 16:21
Status Success
Total duration 36m 49s
Artifacts

build.yml

on: pull_request
checktodos
4s
checktodos
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

40 warnings
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
There is no flag or option with this name:
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.09-flambda, local)
There is no flag or option with this name: