Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

postfixadmin: 3.3.13 -> 3.3.15 #367821

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/postfixadmin/postfixadmin/releases.

meta.description for postfixadmin is: Web based virtual user administration interface for Postfix mail servers

meta.homepage for postfixadmin is: https://postfixadmin.sourceforge.io/

Updates performed
  • Version update
To inspect upstream changes
Impact

Checks done


  • built on NixOS
  • The tests defined in passthru.tests, if any, passed
  • found 3.3.15 with grep in /nix/store/fivrcly30nj76drzn23aaw0h4gf3w2ll-postfixadmin-3.3.15
  • found 3.3.15 in filename of file in /nix/store/fivrcly30nj76drzn23aaw0h4gf3w2ll-postfixadmin-3.3.15

Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
2 total rebuild path(s)

2 package rebuild(s)

First fifty rebuilds by attrpath

postfixadmin
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from the cache:

nix-store -r /nix/store/fivrcly30nj76drzn23aaw0h4gf3w2ll-postfixadmin-3.3.15 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nixpkgs-update-cache.nix-community.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nixpkgs-update-cache.nix-community.org-1:U8d6wiQecHUPJFSqHN9GSSmNkmdiFW7GW7WNAnHW0SM=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The nixpkgs-update cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the cached download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A postfixadmin https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/0f35384d475321c97b2b2220ebc97c2c5bf40708.tar.gz

Or:

nix build github:r-ryantm/nixpkgs/0f35384d475321c97b2b2220ebc97c2c5bf40708#postfixadmin

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/fivrcly30nj76drzn23aaw0h4gf3w2ll-postfixadmin-3.3.15
ls -la /nix/store/fivrcly30nj76drzn23aaw0h4gf3w2ll-postfixadmin-3.3.15/bin


Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • postfixadmin

Maintainer pings

cc @globin for testing.

Tip

As a maintainer, if your package is located under pkgs/by-name/*, you can comment @NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge to automatically merge this update using the nixpkgs-merge-bot.


Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@dotlambda dotlambda added the 2.status: needs-changes This PR needs changes by the author label Feb 17, 2025
@dotlambda dotlambda force-pushed the auto-update/postfixadmin branch from 0f35384 to 329f9d0 Compare February 21, 2025 00:10
@dotlambda dotlambda removed the 2.status: needs-changes This PR needs changes by the author label Feb 21, 2025
@dotlambda dotlambda force-pushed the auto-update/postfixadmin branch from 329f9d0 to e8c99ba Compare February 21, 2025 00:11
@dotlambda
Copy link
Member

dotlambda commented Feb 21, 2025

Update bundled smarty (4.5.4); PostfixAdmin should not be vulnerable to CVE-2024-35226 mentioned in the release etc.

Should this be backported nevertheless?

@dotlambda dotlambda merged commit bf7aecc into NixOS:master Feb 21, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/postfixadmin branch February 22, 2025 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants