Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add types-dateparser to dev deps #17212

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sobolevn
Copy link
Contributor

Adds https://pypi.org/project/types-dateparser to dev deps.
We are working on [email protected] which in the future will not include types-dateparser by default as it does now.

See python/mypy#18372

Proactively fixing projects that are affected by it :)

Checklist

  • This pull request references any related issue by including "closes <link to issue>"
    • If no issue exists and your change is not a small fix, please create an issue first.
  • If this pull request adds new functionality, it includes unit tests that cover the changes
  • If this pull request removes docs files, it includes redirect settings in mint.json.
  • If this pull request adds functions or classes, it includes helpful docstrings.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 20, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #17212 will not alter performance

Comparing sobolevn:types-dateparser (5ee69fc) with main (b5f68ba)

Summary

✅ 2 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Member

@desertaxle desertaxle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sobolevn!

@desertaxle desertaxle added the development Tech debt, refactors, CI, tests, and other related work. label Feb 20, 2025
@desertaxle desertaxle merged commit be0627f into PrefectHQ:main Feb 20, 2025
51 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
development Tech debt, refactors, CI, tests, and other related work.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants