Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FINERACT-2169: SMS API refactoring and clean up; #4353

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VictorPavfurious
Copy link

Description

Describe the changes made and why they were made.

Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Write the commit message as per https://github.com/apache/fineract/#pull-requests

  • Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.

  • Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.

  • Follow coding conventions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Coding+Conventions.

  • Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes

  • Submission is not a "code dump". (Large changes can be made "in repository" via a branch. Ask on the developer mailing list for guidance, if required.)

FYI our guidelines for code reviews are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide.


@GET
public String retrieveAll(@Context final UriInfo uriInfo) {
public Collection<SmsData> retrieveAll() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use List instead?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, you are right, better use List

this.jdbcTemplate = jdbcTemplate;
this.sqlGenerator = sqlGenerator;
@PostConstruct
public void init() {
this.businessRuleMapper = new BusinessRuleMapper(sqlGenerator);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we just do the initialization at field definition?

private final SmsCampaignMapper smsCampaignMapper = new SmsCampaignMapper();
private final BusinessRuleMapper this.businessRuleMapper = new BusinessRuleMapper(sqlGenerator);

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@adamsaghy what do you think about make this SmsCampaignMapper and BusinessRuleMapper like bean Component and inject via construct with using DI?
I think it will be better

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants