Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

p2p: lowered log lvl for failed enr request #2867

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

p2p: lowered log lvl for failed enr request #2867

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

MatusKysel
Copy link
Contributor

Description

resolves #2857

Rationale

tell us why we need these changes...

Example

add an example CLI or API response...

Changes

Notable changes:

  • add each change in a bullet point here
  • ...

@MatusKysel MatusKysel requested review from buddh0 and zzzckck January 28, 2025 07:12
@zzzckck
Copy link
Collaborator

zzzckck commented Feb 5, 2025

approved, but one question:
"loopback address from non-loopback host": it is a network error about the loopback address(IP pattern: x.x.x.127), why it is triggered so frequently in QA env?

@MatusKysel
Copy link
Contributor Author

approved, but one question: "loopback address from non-loopback host": it is a network error about the loopback address(IP pattern: x.x.x.127), why it is triggered so frequently in QA env?

Hey, I think it due to our QA, we have maybe wrong config there. Where nodes will pick up external IP of the machine but as it's running on (same machine ?) some close env response is from loop back 127.... just different port probably. We could try to fix the config but as it's not effecting anything it's not worth of time

@MatusKysel MatusKysel merged commit b758f71 into develop Feb 5, 2025
7 checks passed
@MatusKysel MatusKysel deleted the enr-log branch February 5, 2025 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants