Idea: Enforce 100% covering by Flow

[steida]

Atom somehow shows how much code is covered by Flow. CleanScript demands 100% I guess.

[steida]

This is it https://github.com/gajus/eslint-plugin-flowtype

[yantakus]

@steida what do you mean by "this is it"? I can't see any rules in eslint-plugin-flowtype to enforce 100% flow coverage.

[steida]

@yantakus I mean, we can add such rule.

[yantakus]

Yes, would be great.

[r01010010]

I totally second this.

[devinrhode2]

I also think Flow would be an amazing compliment to this project. I found this repo through my interest in elm, and think that for somebody initially interested in elm, that person would usually give preference to flow instead of typescript, because flow shares the goal of no runtime exceptions with elm. (These are some pretty good slides, and this one in particular really hit home for me: https://djcordhose.github.io/flow-vs-typescript/2016_hhjs.html#/21) Flow gives you more type safety per type signature: https://medium.com/the-thinkmill/adopting-flow-typescript-3549a3a36d51 And you don't have potential tooling conflicts because of the different file extension.

…

On 01/06/2017 8:23 AM, "Paloma Jiménez" ***@***.***> wrote: I totally second this. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#11 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAg8qLG5L9k1YAvZE7NGIZ6icsHYqdQ-ks5r_rs7gaJpZM4J4i38> .