Prevent invocation on not existing editable [FF] #4800
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f1ames
suggested changes
Jul 26, 2021
|
Hi, @f1ames - PR is ready for another review. I've removed the gecko restriction from manual test. The mobile restriction is still there due to the dev console usage... |
|
Hi @f1ames, |
|
Rebased onto latest |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Bug fix
Does your PR contain necessary tests?
All patches that change the editor code must include tests. You can always read more
on PR testing,
how to set the testing environment and
how to create tests
in the official CKEditor documentation.
This PR contains
Did you follow the CKEditor 4 code style guide?
Your code should follow the guidelines from the CKEditor 4 code style guide which helps keep the entire codebase consistent.
What is the proposed changelog entry for this pull request?
What changes did you make?
I just added some prevention in one
ifstatement. So in case the editable isnullnothing happened. The source of the issue is described here. Also this event is fired again anyway after the editable is fully initialized. So ignoring it one time (actually only in FF) doesn't break the feature.I wasn't able to get this error when I switched modes with automatic tests. So I decided to use the manual one.
Which issues does your PR resolve?
Closes #4782 .