Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start Cosmos SDK 0.39 compatible chain in CI #242

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
webmaster128 opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #274
Closed
1 of 3 tasks

Start Cosmos SDK 0.39 compatible chain in CI #242

webmaster128 opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #274
Assignees

Comments

@webmaster128
Copy link
Member

webmaster128 commented Jun 23, 2020

In order to test the upcoming @cosmjs/sdk39, we need a version of gaia running in the CI.

Examples scripts:

This includes 3 things

@webmaster128 webmaster128 changed the title Start Cosmos SDK 0.39 compatible version of Gaia in CI Start Cosmos SDK 0.39 compatible chain in CI Jun 24, 2020
@webmaster128
Copy link
Member Author

The first item in the checkbox is answered by this PR: cosmos/cosmos-sdk#6517 We'll use simapp instead of gaia.

@ethanfrey
Copy link
Contributor

It seems there is no CI build yet, but you can do the following:

git clone https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk.git
cd cosmos-sdk
git checkout master
git pull

docker build -t cosmwasm/simapp:latest .
docker push cosmwasm/simapp;latest

I have just built and pushed this (with my accepted pr fixing the bank attributes): https://hub.docker.com/r/cosmwasm/simapp/tags

Note this has no scripts like the wasmd one does, but rather you must call docker from your scripts. eg docker run -p 26657:26657 -p 26656:26656 -v ~/.simapp:/root/.simapp simapp simd init test-chain

Note that simapp looks for both simcli and simd config in /root/.simapp, so you may want to mount them on different dirs. Also, there is a pending PR to merge them into one simd binary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants