Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0-staging] Ensure Vector.Create is properly recognized as intrinsic #109322

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Backport of #108945 to release/9.0-staging

/cc @tannergooding

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

#108929

Customers using System.Numerics.Vector<T> may see unexpected perf slowdowns on .NET 9 due to the new Vector(T scalar) APIs no longer being recognized as [Intrinsic] and therefore not being accelerated by the JIT.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Vector<T> is one of the original hardware accelerated types introduced in 2014 for .NET Framework. There have been multiple iterations over the past several releases modernizing the JIT implementation to bring it inline with the newer types exposed by the System.Runtime.Intrinsics namespace.

The regression was introduced in .NET 9 as part of one of the larger refactorings done for the System.Numerics.Vector<T> types when the Vector.Create<T>(T scalar) APIs were added for parity and the existing constructors were meant to defer to these APIs.

Testing

JIT disassembly was checked to ensure it was generated the expected output.

Risk

Low. This is a lowlevel performance oriented API. The regression is one of performance and not of correctness.

The fix is simply ensuring the existing logic is correctly hooked up to the new APIs as was intended.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Oct 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

CC. @dotnet/jit-contrib, @BruceForstall for review

@JulieLeeMSFT this should be considered for backport since its a perf regression in one of the intrinsic APIs, which are expected to be accelerated, and a user reported the initial regression

@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

CC. @JulieLeeMSFT, I think this is just pending management approval for backport now.

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. we will take for consideration in 9.0.x

@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Dec 2, 2024
@tannergooding tannergooding added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Dec 4, 2024
@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

Approved by tactics over e-mail

@tannergooding tannergooding merged commit 329fdab into release/9.0-staging Dec 4, 2024
150 of 152 checks passed
@tannergooding tannergooding deleted the backport/pr-108945-to-release/9.0-staging branch December 4, 2024 17:24
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants