-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Microsoft.DotNet.Helix.Sdk #68024
Conversation
Extracted from dotnet#67771 to get the fix for dotnet#67349
I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this should work
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure |
@akoeplinger @premun Is there something wrong with the xharness bump? I'm seeing this in some of the failed runs:
|
There is an issue on the wasm DebuggerTests leg that blocks this yeah |
Ignore the Python error, that one is normal for all wasm runs even though they were supposed to turn off the telemetry to hide it. Regardless it is harmless |
Are you sure? Some of these legs have all passes in their testResults.xml, but yet are being flagged as a failure. |
@steveisok can you show me an example? |
/azp run runtime-wasm |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-wasm |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-wasm |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@akoeplinger the build is looking good so far. I believe it's going to finish green. The one failing wasm leg is a failing test, I checked the logs |
@premun not sure whether the two failing wasm jobs are real failures, they just print this which is weird:
|
@radical do you know what could be up with the two failing WASM legs? We are forcing .NET 6.0 SDK in this PR like I was describing |
@premun I just looked at the run_py.log and it looks like an infrastructure issue with Docker to me:
|
Yay, it's green ✅ 🎉 @premun thank you for digging into this! |
Extracted from dotnet#67771 to get the fix for dotnet#67349 Updates the WASM tests to always use net6.0 until we can upgrade to a net7.0 SDK. Co-authored-by: Premek Vysoky <[email protected]>
Extracted from #67771 to get the fix for #67349
Updates the WASM tests to always use net6.0 until we can upgrade to a net7.0 SDK.