Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistently apply SourceModelStorage name #655

Closed
tortmayr opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Consistently apply SourceModelStorage name #655

tortmayr opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tortmayr
Copy link
Contributor

tortmayr commented May 20, 2022

With eclipse-glsp/glsp-server#154 we introduced a conceptual change and decided to avoid the
term Model Source altogether and instead introduce and
consistently use "source model" to refer to the underlying model that we
read and write.

However, at this point this name change is not consistently applied everywhere. I found the following references to the old model source term:

  • Package name of org.eclipse.glsp.server.features.modelsourcewatcher [Java-Server]
  • ModelSourceChangedAction [server & client/protocol]
  • modelSourceWatcher feature [Client]
  • TheiaModelSourceChangedHandler [theia]
@tortmayr tortmayr added the enhancement New feature or request label May 20, 2022
@planger planger self-assigned this Jun 1, 2022
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-server that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
This is to be consistent with the term source model that we now use to
refer to the underlying model from which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-client that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-client that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-server that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
This is to be consistent with the term source model that we now use to
refer to the underlying model from which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
planger added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

#655
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-theia-integration that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655

Change-Id: Ica2359681f2edb2523aad9d2869d265ad241e381
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-theia-integration that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655

Change-Id: Ica2359681f2edb2523aad9d2869d265ad241e381
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-server-node that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the term
source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from which
the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
tortmayr pushed a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-client that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
tortmayr pushed a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-server that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
…171)

This is to be consistent with the term source model that we now use to
refer to the underlying model from which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
tortmayr added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-theia-integration that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
* Rename `ModelSourceChangedAction`

... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655

Change-Id: Ica2359681f2edb2523aad9d2869d265ad241e381

* Consume latest glsp-client next version

Co-authored-by: Tobias Ortmayr <[email protected]>
tortmayr pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

#655
planger added a commit to eclipse-glsp/glsp-server-node that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2022
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the term
source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from which
the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
holkerveen pushed a commit to holkerveen/glsp-client that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
holkerveen pushed a commit to holkerveen/glsp-client that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
... to `SourceModelChangedAction`. This is to be consistent with the
term source model that we now use to refer to the underlying model from
which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
MatthiasHofstaetter pushed a commit to MatthiasHofstaetter/glsp-server that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
…clipse-glsp#171)

This is to be consistent with the term source model that we now use to
refer to the underlying model from which the GModel is created.

eclipse-glsp/glsp#655
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants