Add EIP: Delayed execution #9376
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
eth-bot
added
e-consensus
18 tasks
github-actions
bot
added
c-new
SamWilsn
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
|
The commit a89b74d (as a parent of 37db202) contains errors. |
EIP-7623: Fix linter issues EIP-7623: Fix linter issues EIP-7623: Fix linter issues EIP-7623: Fix linter issues
nerolation
force-pushed
the
delayed-exec-eip
branch
from
d4ced7b to
ce96421
Compare
rkrasiuk
reviewed
Feb 19, 2025
|
|
||
| ## Abstract | ||
|
|
||
| This proposal makes (execution) blocks statically verifiable through minimal checks that only require the previous state, but no execution of the block's transactions, allowing validators attest to a block's validity without completing its execution. We allow transactions to be skipped when invalid at execution time, without invalidating the whole block. To ensure that even skipped transactions pay for their resources, the `COINBASE` pays for all inclusion costs upfront (base cost, calldata and blobs), and recovers the costs only when transactions are successfully executed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
one unmentioned consideration here is that this will require EL clients to bring back or introduce signer management for local payload building
Marchhill
reviewed
Feb 25, 2025
|
|
||
| #### Coinbase signature over the header | ||
|
|
||
| We include a signature from `COINBASE` over the rest of the header in the header , so that the `COINBASE` address can authorize the upfront payment of inclusion costs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| We include a signature from `COINBASE` over the rest of the header in the header , so that the `COINBASE` address can authorize the upfront payment of inclusion costs. | |
| We include a signature from `COINBASE` over the rest of the header in the header, so that the `COINBASE` address can authorize the upfront payment of inclusion costs. |
|
|
||
| We include a signature from `COINBASE` over the rest of the header in the header , so that the `COINBASE` address can authorize the upfront payment of inclusion costs. | ||
|
|
||
| The final header structure then is: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| The final header structure then is: | |
| The final header structure is then: |
g11tech
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
eth-bot
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes delayed execution as described in this ethresearch post:
https://ethresear.ch/t/delayed-execution-and-skipped-transactions/21677
Find Specs here:
ethereum/execution-specs@master...fradamt:execution-specs:delayed-exec-basic