Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #230 Build on RHEL #229

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 25, 2018
Merged

Conversation

jmelis
Copy link
Contributor

@jmelis jmelis commented Apr 11, 2018

Enable build on RHEL if TARGET=rhel.

The cico environment will continue to build the CentOS based container and in a second step it will build and push a RHEL based container. As of now, the CentOS containers will be the ones being deployed to prod-preview and prod.

This PR will remain as a WIP until this PR is merged and validated:
fabric8-services/fabric8-auth#432

@jmelis jmelis force-pushed the move-to-rhel branch 2 times, most recently from 63516d0 to dcb5ab4 Compare April 12, 2018 10:05
jmelis added a commit to jmelis/fabric8-jenkins-proxy that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2018
@jmelis jmelis changed the title WIP: Build on RHEL WIP: Issue #229 Build on RHEL Apr 12, 2018
@jmelis
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmelis commented Apr 12, 2018

Renamed PR title and commit message according to this message.

@jmelis jmelis changed the title WIP: Issue #229 Build on RHEL WIP: Issue #230 Build on RHEL Apr 12, 2018
@jmelis jmelis force-pushed the move-to-rhel branch 2 times, most recently from eb8d86e to e6728cf Compare April 12, 2018 13:48
@jmelis jmelis changed the title WIP: Issue #230 Build on RHEL Issue #230 Build on RHEL Apr 24, 2018
@jmelis
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmelis commented Apr 24, 2018

@chmouel can you please review and merge?

@chmouel chmouel merged commit 70a628e into fabric8-services:master Apr 25, 2018
@kishansagathiya kishansagathiya mentioned this pull request May 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants