[match] Include visionOS devices in provisioning profiles

[peter-gyarmati]

Checklist

• I've run bundle exec rspec from the root directory to see all new and existing tests pass
• I've followed the fastlane code style and run bundle exec rubocop -a to ensure the code style is valid
• I see several green ci/circleci builds in the "All checks have passed" section of my PR (connect CircleCI to GitHub if not)
• I've read the Contribution Guidelines
• I've updated the documentation if necessary.
• I've added or updated relevant unit tests.

Motivation and Context

See #21860 for more context.

Description

Added APPLE_VISION_PRO to the DeviceClass enum in order to include Vision Pro devices in iOS provisioning profiles.
Also added VISION_OS to SpaceShip to support the platform in AppStore connect.

Testing Steps

Generated new provisioning profiles and validated that the devices are present in the iOS provisioning profiles.

Did it with the following steps:

profile=$(security cms -D -i <PATH-TO_PROFILE>)
echo $profile | grep "<DEVICE_UDID>"

This should return successfully if the device is present in the profile.

[peter-gyarmati]

@rogerluan @lacostej Could you please take a look at this PR? I'd like to get it merged before the next release. (When is the next release?)

[lacostej]

LGTM.

One thing I wonder is that if I understand correctly, Apple has renamed xros into visionos at the last minute.

We just introduced the public parameter for pilot in #21841, and I wonder if we should have named it visionos instead.

[peter-gyarmati]

LGTM.

One thing I wonder is that if I understand correctly, Apple has renamed xros into visionos at the last minute.

We just introduced the public parameter for pilot in #21841, and I wonder if we should have named it visionos instead.

I think they didn't decide on the naming yet, that's why I went with both options. Actually if you unpack a provisioning profile, the platform part looks like this:

<key>Platform</key>
	<array>
		<string>iOS</string>
		<string>xrOS</string>
		<string>visionOS</string>
	</array> 

IMHO the most sustainable way would be supporting both until Apple decides on one or the other. (However my hunch is that both will stay in different circumstances)

P.s. If you could merge it, I would be grateful.

[peter-gyarmati]

Could someone please merge this? @lacostej @rogerluan