Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize ReactiveESM.select #7699

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

Generalize ReactiveESM.select #7699

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

philippjfr
Copy link
Member

Previously you had to be quite careful to implement the select method on custom components but since we now have Child and Children parameters it is now quite straightforward to implement a generalized select method.

@philippjfr philippjfr changed the title Generalize Viewable.select Generalize ReactiveESM.select Feb 11, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.77%. Comparing base (fe88d56) to head (96b904e).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7699      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.77%   86.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         346      346              
  Lines       52473    52489      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits        45536    45545       +9     
- Misses       6937     6944       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit f2727ee into main Feb 11, 2025
14 of 18 checks passed
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the generalize_select branch February 11, 2025 14:53
philippjfr added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
* Generalize Viewable.select

* Generalize ReactiveESM.select only

* Revert Float.select
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant