Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move towards using only named errors #131

Closed
whyrusleeping opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Move towards using only named errors #131

whyrusleeping opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature

Comments

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

It would be nice to move away from doing return errors.New("Blah Blah Blah") and start making global scope error variables. This will make it easier to handle certain errors we might be expecting and clean up the codebase a bit.
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added the kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature label Sep 28, 2014
@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Sep 29, 2014

+:100:

@jbenet jbenet closed this as completed Mar 28, 2015
laurentsenta pushed a commit to laurentsenta/kubo that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2022
@marten-seemann
Merge pull request ipfs#131 from ipfs/fix-staticcheck
68ea654 
remove period, fix staticcheck
laurentsenta pushed a commit to laurentsenta/kubo that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2022
@marten-seemann
go-ipfs-config: Merge pull request ipfs#131 from ipfs/fix-staticcheck
2caa3b1 
remove period, fix staticcheck
laurentsenta pushed a commit to laurentsenta/kubo that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2022
@marten-seemann
go-ipfs-config: Merge pull request ipfs#131 from ipfs/fix-staticcheck
e14c5e2 
remove period, fix staticcheck
laurentsenta pushed a commit to laurentsenta/kubo that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2022
@marten-seemann
go-ipfs-config: Merge pull request ipfs#131 from ipfs/fix-staticcheck
b14afc2 
remove period, fix staticcheck
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jbenet @whyrusleeping