We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
% pandoc --version pandoc 1.12.1 [...] % cat bug.md ***a**b **c**d* % pandoc bug.md <p><em><strong>a</strong>b <strong><strong>a</strong>c</strong>d</em></p> # whereas I would expect: <p><em><strong>a</strong>b <strong>c</strong>d</em></p>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ouch, that's a bad one. Getting parsing rules for nested emph and strong that have good performance characteristics is surprisingly tricky.
Workaround for now: use _ for the exterior emph.
_
+++ nahoj [Nov 21 13 07:15 ]:
% pandoc --version pandoc 1.12.0.2 [...] % cat bug.md ***a**b **c**d* % pandoc bug.md <p><em><strong>a</strong>b <strong><strong>a</strong>c</strong>d</em></p> # whereas I would expect: <p><em><strong>a</strong>b <strong>c</strong>d</em></p> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #1066
% pandoc --version pandoc 1.12.0.2 [...] % cat bug.md ***a**b **c**d* % pandoc bug.md <p><em><strong>a</strong>b <strong><strong>a</strong>c</strong>d</em></p> # whereas I would expect: <p><em><strong>a</strong>b <strong>c</strong>d</em></p>
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #1066
Sorry, something went wrong.
cf149fc
No branches or pull requests
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: