Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update process for infrastructural proposals #131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

llvm-beanz
Copy link
Collaborator

This updates the process docmentation and adds a new template for describing infrastructural proposals. This will allow us to use this process format for desigining project infrastructure and implementation details within the tooling that may not have language or other user exposure.

This updates the process docmentation and adds a new template for
describing infrastructural proposals. This will allow us to use this
process format for desigining project infrastructure and implementation
details within the tooling that may not have language or other user
exposure.
Copy link
Collaborator

@tex3d tex3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@pow2clk pow2clk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for clarifying this!

@llvm-beanz llvm-beanz merged commit db6623f into microsoft:main Jan 9, 2024
llvm-beanz added a commit to llvm-beanz/hlsl-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2025
This updates the process docmentation and adds a new template for
describing infrastructural proposals. This will allow us to use this
process format for desigining project infrastructure and implementation
details within the tooling that may not have language or other user
exposure.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants