-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NXxpcs: discuss at telco #1007
Comments
Also, other concerns, were noted in issues:
each of which was resolved in a matching pull request, listed here: |
XPCS community will request participation in upcoming telco to discuss. Needs to go on agenda for that meeting. |
The doc string should make it clear that either format may be used, but one of them MUST be used. |
It seems the only remaining item to be resolved was the multiple representations of g2 (and twotime). The NXcanSAS specification has a similar representation of Q in either of two forms. Advice today was that we have nothing to change today, other than the documentation addition above. |
|
There was also discussion about this remark:
which comes from: definitions/contributed_definitions/NXxpcs.nxdl.xml Lines 158 to 162 in e9f7406
definitions/contributed_definitions/NXxpcs.nxdl.xml Lines 173 to 177 in e9f7406
|
There was some discussion about
@storage_mode
and the two different representations of g2. This would be best discussed in a meeting where both members of the XPCS community and the NeXus tech committee are present.Originally posted by @prjemian in #982 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: