Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(core): change to use init generator during import #30029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

xiongemi
Copy link
Collaborator

@xiongemi xiongemi commented Feb 13, 2025

Current Behavior

  • call init generator using implementationFactory, causing issue because schema.json file isnt respected, and then NX_INTERACTIVE is never set to true

Expected Behavior

  • change back to run init command

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

@xiongemi xiongemi requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 17:44
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nx-dev ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 13, 2025 7:40pm

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 13, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 56f9e74.

Command Status Duration Result
nx affected --targets=lint,test,build,e2e,e2e-c... ✅ Succeeded 38m 27s View ↗
nx run-many -t check-imports check-commit check... ✅ Succeeded 18s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx-cloud conformance:check ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx format:check --base= --he... ✅ Succeeded 10s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx sync:check ✅ Succeeded 9s View ↗
nx documentation ✅ Succeeded 1m 52s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-02-13 20:22:07 UTC

@xiongemi xiongemi force-pushed the fix/change-back-init-generator branch 3 times, most recently from f18c7f9 to 0ceed5d Compare February 13, 2025 19:35
@xiongemi xiongemi requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 19:35
@xiongemi xiongemi force-pushed the fix/change-back-init-generator branch from 0ceed5d to 56f9e74 Compare February 13, 2025 19:37
@jaysoo jaysoo merged commit ef08108 into master Feb 14, 2025
12 checks passed
@jaysoo jaysoo deleted the fix/change-back-init-generator branch February 14, 2025 03:02
jaysoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->

<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->

<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->

## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
- call init generator using implementationFactory, causing issue because
schema.json file isnt respected, and then NX_INTERACTIVE is never set to
true

## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
- change back to run init command

## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->

Fixes #
jaysoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->

<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->

<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->

## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
- call init generator using implementationFactory, causing issue because
schema.json file isnt respected, and then NX_INTERACTIVE is never set to
true

## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
- change back to run init command

## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->

Fixes #
jaysoo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->

<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->

<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->

## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
- call init generator using implementationFactory, causing issue because
schema.json file isnt respected, and then NX_INTERACTIVE is never set to
true

## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
- change back to run init command

## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->

Fixes #
Copy link

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 20, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants