Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Block rasterio 1.3.0 which has broken warp implementation. #852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

SpacemanPaul
Copy link
Contributor

Rasterio-1.3.0 is buggy. See #851. 1.2.x is fine and the main branch is fine at time of writing, so 1.3.1 should be fine too.

Also commented out a redundant config entry in the integration test config file.

@SpacemanPaul SpacemanPaul requested a review from pindge July 18, 2022 03:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #852 (6480d68) into master (7074a58) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #852   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.94%   93.94%           
=======================================
  Files          43       43           
  Lines        6276     6276           
=======================================
  Hits         5896     5896           
  Misses        380      380           

@SpacemanPaul SpacemanPaul merged commit 620bbcd into master Jul 18, 2022
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the avoid-buggy-rasterio branch July 18, 2022 03:40
@woodcockr
Copy link
Member

I'm seeing issues with rasterio 1.3.1 - just letting you know this might be back since 1.3.1 came out 2 days ago

@SpacemanPaul
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep. rasterio-1.3.1 was a botched release - 1.3.2 was released over the weekend and fixes things. Working on PRs for core and ows now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants