Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add description for VectorDBTool and remove json parsing for RAGTool #121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

mingshl
Copy link
Contributor

@mingshl mingshl commented Jan 11, 2024

Description

Add description for VectorDBTool and remove json parsing for RAGTool

To avoid special characters in parsing the questions from users, removing the json parsing to allow more flexibilities from users' questions.

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@ylwu-amzn
Copy link
Collaborator

I see some test failure

=== Standard output of node `node{::integTest-0}` ===

> Task :integTest FAILED

?    ? errors and warnings from /__w/skills/skills/build/testclusters/integTest-0/logs/opensearch.stdout.log ?
? ERROR][o.o.b.OpenSearchUncaughtExceptionHandler] [integTest-0] fatal error in thread [main], exiting
?  java.util.ServiceConfigurationError: org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec: Provider org.opensearch.knn.index.codec.KNN910Codec.KNN910Codec could not be instantiated

@mingshl
Copy link
Contributor Author

mingshl commented Jan 12, 2024

@ylwu-amzn can you please help rerunning the test? I don't see error in local build

@ylwu-amzn
Copy link
Collaborator

@ylwu-amzn can you please help rerunning the test? I don't see error in local build

sure, reran it

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (cf20a00) 81.23% compared to head (50fedd0) 80.82%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #121      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     81.23%   80.82%   -0.42%     
  Complexity      193      193              
============================================
  Files            13       13              
  Lines           975      975              
  Branches        130      130              
============================================
- Hits            792      788       -4     
- Misses          133      137       +4     
  Partials         50       50              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ylwu-amzn ylwu-amzn merged commit c81746e into opensearch-project:main Jan 12, 2024
15 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2024
…121)

Signed-off-by: Mingshi Liu <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c81746e)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
rbhavna pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
…121) (#124)

(cherry picked from commit c81746e)

Signed-off-by: Mingshi Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
yuye-aws pushed a commit to yuye-aws/skills that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2024
…pensearch-project#121) (opensearch-project#124)

(cherry picked from commit c81746e)

Signed-off-by: Mingshi Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: yuye-aws <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants