Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wip: release-4.18: staticpod block adding revisioned operand #2205

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.18
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

benluddy
Copy link

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Feb 12, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@benluddy
Copy link
Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-cluster-control-plane-machine-set-operator-release-4.18-periodics-e2e-azure 5

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 12, 2025

@benluddy: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-cluster-control-plane-machine-set-operator-release-4.18-periodics-e2e-azure

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/61864bf0-e988-11ef-85b5-685f8551ffcd-0

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and jerpeter1 February 12, 2025 21:30
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benluddy
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign deads2k for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@benluddy benluddy force-pushed the release-4.18-staticpod-block-adding-revisioned-operand branch from bbee78e to 454c3b8 Compare February 12, 2025 23:13
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 13, 2025

@benluddy: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-commits 454c3b8 link true /test verify-commits
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 454c3b8 link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants