Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add is_post_merge implementation for Hardfork #6204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

add is_post_merge implementation for Hardfork #6204

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

tcoratger
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request introduces the implementation of the is_post_merge function for the Hardfork enum. The is_post_merge function returns true for hardforks starting from Paris and false for earlier hardforks.

Changes Made

  • Implemented the is_post_merge function for the Hardfork enum.

@tcoratger tcoratger requested a review from gakonst as a code owner January 24, 2024 09:12
mattsse
mattsse approved these changes Jan 24, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reasonable

@mattsse mattsse added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 24, 2024
@mattsse mattsse added the C-enhancement New feature or request label Jan 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into paradigmxyz:main with commit cff0b12 Jan 24, 2024
28 checks passed
shekhirin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
@tcoratger @shekhirin
add is_post_merge implementation for Hardfork (#6204)
649fdbe
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mattsse mattsse mattsse approved these changes

@gakonst gakonst Awaiting requested review from gakonst

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tcoratger @mattsse