-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce smith
subplot and scattersmith
trace type
#5956
Conversation
This is just a copy of scatterpolar with a changed name.
This commit also adds a `smith` plot type, which is a copy of polar, with minimal changes needed to host the `scattersmith` trace type.
Also cleaned up code a little bit.
This is to eliminate some state-based errors appearing in the image tests.
real: { | ||
valType: 'data_array', | ||
editType: 'calc+clearAxisTypes', | ||
description: 'Sets the real coordinates' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we be more explicit here (and for imag
) about what values these should be? Something like "Sets the real component of the data, in units of normalized impedance such that real=1, imag=0
is the center of the chart."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call. Improved by d30416d.
Co-authored-by: Alex Johnson <[email protected]>
Alright, I think we're just about there! Aside from my comment about attribute descriptions, my one remaining question is what we want for the default tick/grid values. It's great that the user can specify explicit But then as to what the default values should be: originally I think I asked for just |
Addressed in cfa96e5. |
- and use 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 set for tickvals
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💃 Excellent! I guess we still need a changelog entry, but I think the feature has finally made it to the finish line 🏁
Resolves #4074.
Revise & complete the work of #5615 reflected in the 60c30f4 commit.
@plotly/plotly_js
cc: @jackparmer