Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LGTM, CodeQL and dependabot findings #106

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

amendelzon
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Adding CodeQL workflow for Python code
  • Removing now unused sample generator (this leaves the repository without any NodeJS/Javascript code)
  • Bumping certifi, Pillow and protobuf to dependabot recommended versions
  • Applying two LGTM recommendations of low-risk findings

- Adding CodeQL workflow for Python code
- Removing now unused sample generator (this leaves the repository without any NodeJS/Javascript code)
- Bumping certifi, Pillow and protobuf to dependabot recommended versions
- Applying two LGTM recommendations of low-risk findings
@amendelzon amendelzon marked this pull request as draft December 16, 2022 14:11
italo-sampaio
italo-sampaio previously approved these changes Dec 16, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@italo-sampaio italo-sampaio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

- Back to using 3.0.0.plus branch for integration testing
@amendelzon amendelzon marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2022 16:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@italo-sampaio italo-sampaio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@italo-sampaio italo-sampaio merged commit db90bec into master Dec 16, 2022
@italo-sampaio italo-sampaio deleted the fix/lgtm-warnings-202212 branch December 16, 2022 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants