Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto sync & publish upstream release #2

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 24, 2023

Conversation

rmfranken
Copy link
Member

every 3 days, this gh actions script will look at the upstream repository (topQuadrant SHACL) and ingest its changes if there are any. If a new release has been done, it will also copy that and make a new release with the same version number.

every 3 days, this gh actions script will look at the upstream repository (topQuadrant SHACL) and ingest its changes if there are any. If a new release has been done, it will also copy that and make a new release with the same version number.
@rmfranken
Copy link
Member Author

hold up, this is not right. It's using the wrong repository now, will change it now.

using topquadrant repo instead of ordes one as head
@rmfranken
Copy link
Member Author

Should be right now. @cmdoret Is there any way to test if this works without actually pulling the changes to master?

@cmdoret
Copy link
Member

cmdoret commented Mar 23, 2023

Perhaps temporarily changing the base branch here whould work?

@rmfranken
Copy link
Member Author

Hmmm, this is kind of what I had done with the upstream and downstream branches, so in that sense it should work. I was hoping there was an ability to make a sort of pull request based on the run of GitHub Actions - a human check on what the actions are proposing to do, but I think this is just the opposite of what GHA is made for.

I think we can just see what happens in 3 days. Probably a release will be made (since the latest version on SDSC-ORD/SHACL is called "test". It's unlikely that Holger will release a new version of shacl in the coming 3 days anyway (weekend).

If @supermaxiste also still wants to review to see what our "issue speedrun" has resulted in I let you do the honors of merging if you are satisfied. We can then close the ticket and if anything needs to be changed/improved, we can make a new ticket.

@supermaxiste
Copy link
Member

supermaxiste commented Mar 24, 2023

Besides my minor comments, all the rest looks good and really excited to see the first SDSC-ORD container of a relatively popular tool 🤩 great job @rmfranken!

@supermaxiste supermaxiste merged commit 42f958d into master Mar 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants