Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.

Removed unused purged_slots in purge_older_root_entries #18102

Merged

Conversation

lijunwangs
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

purged_slots hashset is declared and entry added locally and not read.

Summary of Changes

Removed unused purged_slots in purge_older_root_entries
Fixes #

@lijunwangs lijunwangs requested review from sakridge and carllin June 21, 2021 18:36
@lijunwangs lijunwangs force-pushed the remove_unused_hashset_in_purge branch from b402c7e to 23052bc Compare June 21, 2021 18:53
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #18102 (23052bc) into master (97e51df) will decrease coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #18102     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    82.3%    82.3%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         434      434             
  Lines      120963   120961      -2     
=========================================
- Hits        99663    99637     -26     
- Misses      21300    21324     +24     

@carllin carllin added the v1.7 label Jun 22, 2021
@lijunwangs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removed unused purged_slots in purge_older_root_entries

@lijunwangs lijunwangs merged commit ccf6b21 into solana-labs:master Jun 22, 2021
@lijunwangs lijunwangs deleted the remove_unused_hashset_in_purge branch June 22, 2021 22:28
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2021
Removed unused purged_slots in purge_older_root_entries

(cherry picked from commit ccf6b21)
mvines pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2021
Removed unused purged_slots in purge_older_root_entries

(cherry picked from commit ccf6b21)
@brooksprumo brooksprumo mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants