This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Create runtime-transaction crate to build transaction types with state for runtime use #33471
Create runtime-transaction crate to build transaction types with state for runtime use #33471
Changes from all commits
7d0d976
bc44221
13a9cd4
5625ea9
a270550
9a2d30d
6eacf41
39e57fb
43eda39
5b0c1d6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this could be an
impl From<SanitizedVersionedTransaction> for (Vec<Signature>, SanitizedVersionedMessage)
if not make the fieldspub
instead ofpub (crate)
to allow in place destructuringThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fields on
SanitizedVersionedMessage
should not be pub. Them being private is intentional, see the previous discussion on it: #33471 (comment)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From
impl, then. i would assume a method calleddestruct()
to do something... destructive.