Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.

Rename fork selection and locktower to Tower BFT Consensus #4598

Merged

Conversation

aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko commented Jun 7, 2019

Problem

Name the consensus algo.

Summary of Changes

Rename fork selection and locktower to Tower BFT. Rename locktower to Tower. Make metrics and all the names are consistent.

Fixes #

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko requested a review from garious June 7, 2019 20:50
garious
garious previously approved these changes Jun 10, 2019
@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko requested a review from pgarg66 June 10, 2019 22:59
pgarg66
pgarg66 previously approved these changes Jun 10, 2019
@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko force-pushed the fork_selection_to_tower_consensus branch from 5c9e4ea to 4fe35a8 Compare June 20, 2019 04:45
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #4598 into master will decrease coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 97.1%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #4598     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage    78.7%   78.6%   -0.2%     
========================================
  Files         192     192             
  Lines       34260   34404    +144     
========================================
+ Hits        26989   27056     +67     
- Misses       7271    7348     +77

@aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member Author

@sagar-solana
any idea why CI fails with this:


 
--
  | failures:
  | test_replicator_startup_1_node

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko requested a review from sagar-solana June 22, 2019 14:13
@sagar-solana
Copy link
Contributor

No idea. Weird. @danpaul000 ?

@mvines
Copy link
Contributor

mvines commented Jun 22, 2019

I’ve seen that test fail occasionally too. I think we have a number of racy tests again

@aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member Author

Seems to fail repeatedly for this PR

@sagar-solana
Copy link
Contributor

sagar-solana commented Jun 22, 2019

It's unable to bind to some crazy high port. Must be rpc or something binding to "any". Is it running on the same CI machine repeated ?

@aeyakovenko your PR works just fine on my laptop. Maybe need to rebase because one of the flaky tests is ignored.

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko force-pushed the fork_selection_to_tower_consensus branch from 4fe35a8 to ecec24e Compare June 23, 2019 02:31
@mergify mergify bot dismissed stale reviews from garious and pgarg66 June 23, 2019 02:31

Pull request has been modified.

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko force-pushed the fork_selection_to_tower_consensus branch from ecec24e to 0663b7e Compare June 23, 2019 02:32
s/locktower/towerbft/g

fmt

renames

rename

remove second link

metrics

format
@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko force-pushed the fork_selection_to_tower_consensus branch from 0663b7e to 234e628 Compare June 24, 2019 19:58
@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko merged commit 29611fb into solana-labs:master Jun 24, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants