Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: Upgrade GCC version from 7.3 to 7.5 or higher. #12

Closed
RingsC opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #377
Closed

feature: Upgrade GCC version from 7.3 to 7.5 or higher. #12

RingsC opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #377
Assignees
Labels
A-feature feature with good idea prio: high High priority

Comments

@RingsC
Copy link
Contributor

RingsC commented Jun 16, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Now. stonedb compiled with GCC 7.3, and C++ 17. But we want to support the other compiler versions, such as 7.5, 9.x, etc.
The different platforms, such as Suse Linux, RedHat, etc. should be available in future.

Describe the solution you'd like

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@RingsC RingsC added the A-feature feature with good idea label Jun 16, 2022
@hustjieke hustjieke added this to the v0.1 milestone Jun 16, 2022
@hustjieke hustjieke added the prio: high High priority label Jun 17, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2022
#325)

1: To support GCC 7.5 or higher.
2: To fix up some compilation errors.
3: To support `-DWITH_ROCKSDB` and `-DWITH_MARISA` to specify the directories
   in which rocksdb and marisa installed.
@RingsC RingsC closed this as completed Aug 8, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2022
)

If you DO NOT specify the boost, rocksdb and marisa installed path, stonedb will think
these libs were installed at system directories, such as `/usr/local`, etc. Therefore, now,
stonedb will use these system path as run-path when do compiling.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-feature feature with good idea prio: high High priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants