Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make wal checkpoint not fallback to passive mode if busy lock not acq… #1968

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

pereman2
Copy link

…uired

Wal truncate checkpoint may not acquire write lock on WAL and it will fallback to passive mode making it proceed with checkpoint even though we wanted to skip checkpoint altogether.

…uired

Wal truncate checkpoint may not acquire write lock on WAL and it will
fallback to passive mode making it proceed with checkpoint even though
we wanted to skip checkpoint altogether.
@pereman2 pereman2 force-pushed the unfuck-busy-lock-checkpoint branch from bb03e7f to c347f57 Compare February 26, 2025 12:17
--no-default-features cargo-nextest

install nextest for tests encryption too

fmt
@pereman2 pereman2 force-pushed the unfuck-busy-lock-checkpoint branch from 5c519a9 to b49548f Compare February 26, 2025 14:13
@pereman2
Copy link
Author

We found a workaround for this :)

@pereman2 pereman2 closed this Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants