feat: deployments part ii #11
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request updates dependency versions and introduces new dependencies while refactoring concurrent event handling and deployment flows. In the CLI layer, the changes replace standard channels with crossbeam channels, modify function signatures, adjust runbook generation, and add user confirmation prompts. In the core modules, several RPC methods obtain concrete implementations and enhanced logging with unique identifiers. Overall, the modifications standardize channel usage, improve deployment scaffolding, and streamline both CLI and RPC functionalities. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant CLI as CLI Handler
participant DF as Framework Detector
participant SC as Scaffold Builder
participant EX as Runbook Executor
participant LG as Event Logger
U->>CLI: Invoke simnet command
CLI->>DF: Call detect_program_frameworks
alt Framework detected
CLI->>U: Prompt for program selection
U->>CLI: Return selected programs
CLI->>SC: Build runbook layout with selected programs
CLI->>EX: Execute runbook ("deployment")
else Error detected
CLI->>LG: Log error and assign None deployment
end
CLI->>LG: Begin logging events (with deploy_progress_rx)
sequenceDiagram
participant T as TUI App
participant SE as Simnet Events
participant DP as Deployment Progress
T->>T: Start event loop (using select!)
alt Receives simnet event
SE->>T: Send Simnet event
T->>T: Process and update view
else Receives deployment progress event
DP->>T: Send BlockEvent update
T->>T: Update status bar with new message
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
# Conflicts: # crates/cli/src/cli/simnet/mod.rs # crates/cli/src/scaffold/mod.rs # crates/cli/src/tui/simnet.rs
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs (1)
74-79: Remove duplicate error handling block.This error handling block is redundant as it's already handled by the previous block at lines 64-72.
- if let Err(diags) = res { - for diag in diags.iter() { - println!("{} {}", red!("x"), diag); - } - std::process::exit(1); - }
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
crates/cli/src/scaffold/mod.rs (9)
26-26: Check for possible misalignment with other frameworks.The conditional logic to detect an Anchor project might lead to confusion if multiple frameworks are detected or partially present. Consider clarifying or logging when multiple frameworks match, to aid in debugging.
77-77: Redundant empty line.This line is just a placeholder comment or whitespace. Verify if it’s intentional or can be removed to keep the code tidy.
96-99: Initializingrunbook_src.Concatenating multiple template strings is fine. Consider grouping these template additions in a dedicated function or builder pattern to improve readability.
107-112:signer_testnetconstruction repeats.Repetitive code blocks for each environment might benefit from a helper function that generates signer templates. This will reduce duplication and potential drift among environments.
114-119:signer_simnetconstruction.Similar to earlier signers, consider consolidating the environment-based signer creation logic into a single function or data-driven approach.
133-142: Creating aRunbookMetadatastruct.Storing a short
descriptionis helpful. Any chance we want a more detailed or dynamic description (e.g., including environment details)? Just a thought.
170-181: Environment config forlocalnetanddevnet.Adding these environment entries is convenient. Consider adding
mainnetby default, or clarifying thatmainnetenvironment is intentionally omitted from the manifest.
240-254: Generatingmain.tx.You're writing the runbook source to
main.tx. Consider also generating a default “readme” statement in the file that references usage instructions, so new users can quickly see how to run that script.
300-309: Confirmation logic with no revert/rollback.Pressing “no” leaves behind partially created files. Consider an optional cleanup step if the user cancels. This can prevent clutter or confusion on canceled deployments.
crates/cli/src/tui/simnet.rs (3)
101-102: Introducingstatus_bar_message.Adding a transient status bar message is helpful for user feedback. Confirm that messages clear at the right times to avoid user confusion.
179-239: Newselect!usage integrated with simnet events.This concurrency pattern is a clear improvement. However, ensure that no event branch starves the other (especially if
deploy_progress_rxis very active).
269-269: Emptydefaultblock inselect!.This is effectively a “non-blocking” check. If no messages exist, the loop continues. This non-blocking approach is valid but keep an eye on CPU usage when combined with the tight 3 ms poll.
crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs (1)
41-42: Consider making the environment configurable.The hardcoded "localnet" value reduces flexibility. Consider making this configurable through a parameter or environment variable.
crates/core/src/rpc/mod.rs (1)
27-30: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.Good addition of unique identifiers for transaction tracking. Consider adding documentation to explain:
- The purpose of the
idfield- The relationship between
HashandVersionedTransactionin the tuple
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
Cargo.toml(1 hunks)crates/cli/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)crates/cli/src/cli/mod.rs(1 hunks)crates/cli/src/cli/simnet/mod.rs(3 hunks)crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs(3 hunks)crates/cli/src/scaffold/anchor.rs(2 hunks)crates/cli/src/scaffold/mod.rs(10 hunks)crates/cli/src/tui/simnet.rs(9 hunks)crates/core/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)crates/core/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)crates/core/src/rpc/accounts_data.rs(1 hunks)crates/core/src/rpc/bank_data.rs(1 hunks)crates/core/src/rpc/full.rs(2 hunks)crates/core/src/rpc/minimal.rs(1 hunks)crates/core/src/rpc/mod.rs(4 hunks)crates/core/src/simnet/mod.rs(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Cargo.toml
🔇 Additional comments (32)
crates/cli/src/scaffold/mod.rs (7)
1-2: Additions to imports look good.You've introduced
Confirmand other dialoguer utilities, as well as specialized template functions. This is helpful for streamlined user prompts and templating. No issues noted.
8-8: Expanded import forFileLocationandAuthorizationContext.This import suggests new usage of these functionalities. Ensure they’re leveraged securely and tested for potential file system edge cases (e.g., invalid or missing paths).
51-55: Function signature changed to acceptselected_programsandmanifest_path.The revised parameters look like a more direct approach to scaffolding. Double-check all callers of
scaffold_runbooks_layoutto ensure they supply the correct arguments, particularly for the updatedmanifest_path.
63-68: Target directory creation logic.You’re building a
target_locationfor deployments. Verify that it aligns with the standard cargo “target/” behavior or that it won’t conflict with build artifacts. Also confirm that_function_specand_contextplaceholders are not needed for subsequent logic.
100-105:signer_mainnetconstruction.You're preparing a dedicated runbook snippet for mainnet. Evaluate whether storing authority keypair paths in plain text is acceptable or if encryption/different handling is required to avoid potential exposure.
[security]
121-131: Iterating overselected_programsfor anchor deployment templates.This loop appears straightforward. Ensure that if multiple frameworks or non-Anchor programs are selected, the logic either fails gracefully or is extended to handle them appropriately.
224-235: Creatingrunbooks/deploymentdirectory.This logic is straightforward. Ensure your application either has the correct permissions or fails gracefully if creation is disallowed (e.g., on a read-only file system).
crates/cli/src/tui/simnet.rs (11)
2-2: Importing crossbeam concurrency primitives.Switching to
crossbeam::{channel::unbounded, select}is typically more performant than std's channels. Looks good.
13-13: Added import fortime::Duration.This aligns with decreased poll intervals below. Watch for potential CPU load increases from very frequent polling.
18-19: ImportingBlockEventandProgressBarStatusColor.Indicates new or deeper integration with runbook deployment statuses. Ensure that every event type is correctly handled or logged to prevent silent failures.
74-75: Safeguard for optionaldeploy_progress_rx.If
deploy_progress_rxisNone, the code ensures minimal overhead. Good approach to gracefully handle optional concurrency.
79-83: ExtendedApp::newsignature for deployment progress.You’ve added
deploy_progress_rxto track additional events. Make sure the UI remains stable if a large volume of progress events flood in.
145-145: Updatedstart_appto acceptdeploy_progress_rx.Ensure any code paths that call
start_appare updated accordingly and tested. In multi-platform contexts, the optional parameter is a robust design.
155-155: InstantiatingAppwithdeploy_progress_rx.All logic for receiving deployment updates is now integrated into the UI. Confirm that any concurrency edge cases (like channel closure) are handled gracefully.
172-178: Reduced polling to 3 ms.Very frequent polling can introduce CPU overhead. Evaluate system usage under load to confirm a good balance between responsiveness and resource consumption.
[performance]
240-266: HandlingBlockEventupdates.You update the UI differently based on status color, which is great for clarity. Verify no state collisions: if multiple events arrive quickly, ensure the correct final state message is displayed.
272-272: Using 3 ms forevent::poll.As highlighted above, this is quite frequent. If it proves too CPU-heavy in production, consider adjusting or introducing exponential backoff when idle.
[performance]
482-487: Conditional footer display forstatus_bar_message.Providing immediate feedback or help text is a nice UX improvement. Just confirm that partial messages do not persist if events or states change quickly.
crates/core/src/lib.rs (1)
15-15: Migration tocrossbeam_channel::Sender.Adopting crossbeam’s channels typically yields better performance and more flexible concurrency patterns than std’s MPSC. Make sure all related receiving ends are updated and tested.
crates/core/src/rpc/bank_data.rs (1)
64-71: Improve rent exemption calculation.The current implementation:
- Returns a hardcoded value regardless of the data length
- Ignores the commitment parameter
- Doesn't utilize the metadata context
Consider implementing a proper calculation based on data length or documenting why a fixed value is acceptable.
crates/cli/src/cli/mod.rs (1)
16-16: Consider IPv6 compatibility.Changing from "localhost" to "127.0.0.1" makes the binding explicit but might affect IPv6 compatibility. Consider using "::1" for IPv6 or providing both options.
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if IPv6 is used anywhere in the codebase rg "::1"Length of output: 8
I'm not seeing any IPv6 references with the initial command. To get a clearer picture, let’s search for broader IPv6 mentions and see how the constant is used across the codebase. I'll run additional shell scripts to gather more context.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash echo "Searching for IPv6 related references:" rg -i "ipv6" echo "-----" echo "Searching for references to DEFAULT_BINDING_ADDRESS:" rg "DEFAULT_BINDING_ADDRESS"Length of output: 447
IPv6 Compatibility Consideration – No Immediate Impact Detected
- The search for IPv6-related references (e.g., "::1" or case-insensitive "ipv6") in the repository returned no hits.
- The constant
DEFAULT_BINDING_ADDRESS(now set to "127.0.0.1") is used exclusively in an IPv4 context with no current indication of IPv6 support in the codebase.- While this change makes the address explicit, it may affect future IPv6 compatibility if needed. Consider documenting or revisiting this should IPv6 support become a requirement.
crates/core/src/rpc/accounts_data.rs (1)
78-81: LGTM! Removed debug prints.Good cleanup of debug print statements, keeping the code clean for production.
crates/cli/src/cli/simnet/mod.rs (2)
25-25: Good choice using crossbeam channels.Using
crossbeam::channelinstead ofstd::sync::mpscis a good improvement as it provides better performance and more features.
61-84: Well-structured deployment UI and error handling.Good improvements:
- User-friendly colored multi-select prompt for program selection
- Proper error handling with logging
- Clean separation of deployment progress tracking
crates/core/src/simnet/mod.rs (1)
104-104: LGTM! Improved transaction handling.The tuple pattern matching in
mempool_rx.try_recv()makes the code more explicit about the data structure being handled.crates/cli/src/scaffold/anchor.rs (1)
13-15: LGTM! Better separation of concerns.Good refactoring to remove runbook source generation from this function, making it more focused on its primary responsibility of detecting programs.
crates/core/src/rpc/minimal.rs (2)
143-147: LGTM!The get_slot implementation correctly retrieves the current slot from the system variable.
178-186: LGTM!The get_version implementation correctly returns the default version information.
crates/core/src/rpc/full.rs (1)
296-296: LGTM!The send_transaction implementation correctly includes the context ID when sending to mempool.
crates/cli/Cargo.toml (2)
40-40: LGTM!Adding crossbeam dependency aligns with the concurrent processing changes in the codebase.
22-22: Verify compatibility with the new txtx-addon-network-svm version.The dependency version has been updated to 0.1.1.
crates/core/Cargo.toml (1)
40-40: LGTM!Adding crossbeam dependency is consistent with its addition in cli/Cargo.toml and aligns with the concurrent processing changes.
crates/cli/src/scaffold/mod.rs
Outdated
| let mut base_dir = runbook_file_location.get_parent_location().unwrap(); | ||
| base_dir.append_path(&format!("signers.localnet.tx"))?; | ||
| let _ = | ||
| File::create(base_dir.to_string()).expect("creation failed"); | ||
| base_dir.write_content(signer_simnet.as_bytes())?; | ||
| println!( | ||
| "{} {}", | ||
| green!("Created runbook"), | ||
| base_dir | ||
| .get_relative_path_from_base(&base_location) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| ); | ||
| let mut base_dir = base_dir.get_parent_location().unwrap(); | ||
| base_dir.append_path(&format!("signers.testnet.tx"))?; | ||
| let _ = | ||
| File::create(base_dir.to_string()).expect("creation failed"); | ||
| base_dir.write_content(signer_testnet.as_bytes())?; | ||
| println!( | ||
| "{} {}", | ||
| green!("Created runbook"), | ||
| base_dir | ||
| .get_relative_path_from_base(&base_location) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| ); | ||
| let mut base_dir = base_dir.get_parent_location().unwrap(); | ||
| base_dir.append_path(&format!("signers.mainnet.tx"))?; | ||
| let _ = | ||
| File::create(base_dir.to_string()).expect("creation failed"); | ||
| base_dir.write_content(signer_mainnet.as_bytes())?; | ||
| println!( | ||
| "{} {}", | ||
| green!("Created runbook"), | ||
| base_dir | ||
| .get_relative_path_from_base(&base_location) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Creating signer files for localnet, testnet, and mainnet.
The repeated code for each environment can be extracted into a helper function to reduce duplication. Also, verify that writing these keypair references to disk aligns with your security posture.
| let mut collision = false; | ||
| for r in manifest.runbooks.iter() { | ||
| if r.name.eq(&runbook.name) { | ||
| collision = true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if !collision { | ||
| manifest.runbooks.push(runbook); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Collision detection with no fallback solution.
If a runbook with the same name exists, the code sets collision = true but the // todo remains. This might cause silent overwrites or inconsistent states. Recommend handling collisions explicitly (abort, rename, or prompt user).
+ return Err(format!(
+ "A runbook named '{}' already exists. Please rename or remove it.",
+ runbook.name
+ ));Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
crates/core/src/simnet/mod.rs
Outdated
| let server = ServerBuilder::new(io) | ||
| .cors(DomainsValidation::Disabled) | ||
| .start_http(&server_bind).unwrap(); | ||
| let _ = simnet_events_tx_copy.send(SimnetEvent::Ready); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider better error handling for server initialization.
Using unwrap() could cause panic if server initialization fails. Consider proper error handling:
- let server = ServerBuilder::new(io)
- .cors(DomainsValidation::Disabled)
- .start_http(&server_bind).unwrap();
+ let server = match ServerBuilder::new(io)
+ .cors(DomainsValidation::Disabled)
+ .start_http(&server_bind) {
+ Ok(server) => server,
+ Err(e) => {
+ let _ = simnet_events_tx_copy.send(SimnetEvent::Aborted(format!("Failed to start server: {}", e)));
+ return;
+ }
+ };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let server = ServerBuilder::new(io) | |
| .cors(DomainsValidation::Disabled) | |
| .start_http(&server_bind).unwrap(); | |
| let _ = simnet_events_tx_copy.send(SimnetEvent::Ready); | |
| let server = match ServerBuilder::new(io) | |
| .cors(DomainsValidation::Disabled) | |
| .start_http(&server_bind) { | |
| Ok(server) => server, | |
| Err(e) => { | |
| let _ = simnet_events_tx_copy.send(SimnetEvent::Aborted(format!("Failed to start server: {}", e))); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| let _ = simnet_events_tx_copy.send(SimnetEvent::Ready); |
| // println!("get_balance rpc request received: {:?}", pubkey_str); | ||
| let pubkey = verify_pubkey(&pubkey_str)?; | ||
| // meta.get_balance(&pubkey, config.unwrap_or_default()) | ||
| unimplemented!() | ||
| let state_reader = meta.get_state()?; | ||
| let res = RpcResponse { | ||
| context: RpcResponseContext::new(state_reader.epoch_info.absolute_slot), | ||
| value: 10000, | ||
| }; | ||
| Ok(res) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded balance value needs attention.
The implementation returns a hardcoded balance of 10000, which may not be suitable for production use.
Consider implementing actual balance retrieval:
- let res = RpcResponse {
- context: RpcResponseContext::new(state_reader.epoch_info.absolute_slot),
- value: 10000,
- };
+ let balance = state_reader.svm.get_balance(&pubkey)
+ .map_err(|e| Error::invalid_params(format!("Failed to get balance: {}", e)))?;
+ let res = RpcResponse {
+ context: RpcResponseContext::new(state_reader.epoch_info.absolute_slot),
+ value: balance,
+ };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // println!("get_balance rpc request received: {:?}", pubkey_str); | |
| let pubkey = verify_pubkey(&pubkey_str)?; | |
| // meta.get_balance(&pubkey, config.unwrap_or_default()) | |
| unimplemented!() | |
| let state_reader = meta.get_state()?; | |
| let res = RpcResponse { | |
| context: RpcResponseContext::new(state_reader.epoch_info.absolute_slot), | |
| value: 10000, | |
| }; | |
| Ok(res) | |
| // println!("get_balance rpc request received: {:?}", pubkey_str); | |
| let pubkey = verify_pubkey(&pubkey_str)?; | |
| let state_reader = meta.get_state()?; | |
| let balance = state_reader.svm.get_balance(&pubkey) | |
| .map_err(|e| Error::invalid_params(format!("Failed to get balance: {}", e)))?; | |
| let res = RpcResponse { | |
| context: RpcResponseContext::new(state_reader.epoch_info.absolute_slot), | |
| value: balance, | |
| }; | |
| Ok(res) |
| let mut statuses = vec![]; | ||
| for sig in signature_strs.iter() { | ||
| statuses.push(Some(TransactionStatus { | ||
| slot: 0, | ||
| confirmations: Some(5), | ||
| status: Ok(()), | ||
| err: None, | ||
| confirmation_status: Some(TransactionConfirmationStatus::Finalized), | ||
| })); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let res = RpcResponse { | ||
| context: RpcResponseContext::new(0), | ||
| value: statuses, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| Box::pin(future::ready(Ok(res))) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded transaction status needs attention.
The implementation returns hardcoded values for transaction statuses, which may not reflect actual transaction states.
Consider implementing actual transaction status retrieval:
- let mut statuses = vec![];
- for sig in signature_strs.iter() {
- statuses.push(Some(TransactionStatus {
- slot: 0,
- confirmations: Some(5),
- status: Ok(()),
- err: None,
- confirmation_status: Some(TransactionConfirmationStatus::Finalized),
- }));
- }
+ let state_reader = meta.get_state()?;
+ let mut statuses = vec![];
+ for sig_str in signature_strs.iter() {
+ let signature = Signature::from_str(sig_str)
+ .map_err(|err| Error::invalid_params(format!("Invalid signature: {}", err)))?;
+ let status = state_reader.svm.get_signature_status(&signature)?;
+ statuses.push(status);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let mut statuses = vec![]; | |
| for sig in signature_strs.iter() { | |
| statuses.push(Some(TransactionStatus { | |
| slot: 0, | |
| confirmations: Some(5), | |
| status: Ok(()), | |
| err: None, | |
| confirmation_status: Some(TransactionConfirmationStatus::Finalized), | |
| })); | |
| } | |
| let res = RpcResponse { | |
| context: RpcResponseContext::new(0), | |
| value: statuses, | |
| }; | |
| Box::pin(future::ready(Ok(res))) | |
| } | |
| let state_reader = meta.get_state()?; | |
| let mut statuses = vec![]; | |
| for sig_str in signature_strs.iter() { | |
| let signature = Signature::from_str(sig_str) | |
| .map_err(|err| Error::invalid_params(format!("Invalid signature: {}", err)))?; | |
| let status = state_reader.svm.get_signature_status(&signature)?; | |
| statuses.push(status); | |
| } | |
| let res = RpcResponse { | |
| context: RpcResponseContext::new(0), | |
| value: statuses, | |
| }; | |
| Box::pin(future::ready(Ok(res))) | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor