-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Similar vulnerable functions related to CVE-2017-14041 #1044
Comments
hlef
added a commit
to hlef/openjpeg
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2018
Missing buffer length formatter in fscanf call might lead write stack overflow. fixes uclouvain#1044 (CVE-2017-17480)
hlef
added a commit
to hlef/openjpeg
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2018
Missing buffer length formatter in fscanf call might lead to write stack buffer overflow. fixes uclouvain#1044 (CVE-2017-17480)
Assigned CVE-2017-17480. I have submitted a PR addressing this issue. |
hlef
added a commit
to hlef/openjpeg
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2018
Missing buffer length formatter in fscanf call might lead to write stack buffer overflow. fixes uclouvain#1044 (CVE-2017-17480)
8 tasks
Vulnerability in Vulnerability in |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are two functions similar to vulnerable function with id CVE-2017-14041 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-14041 with issue id (#997 ).
Below is the patch for CVE-2017-14041.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35266/352661d18fa9a437a329033cfcdb2d05eb9f99fb" alt="default"
e528531
Below are two functions that similar to the vulnerable function.
I think there are vulnerabilities in those two functions, too. Therefore, there should be patches for those two functions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: