You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Users currently lack the ability to see which Language Learning Models (LLMs) are included in our arena. This lack of visibility makes it difficult for users to understand the range of models they are interacting with or comparing. To enhance user awareness and engagement, it's crucial to display information about the LLM candidates available in the arena.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@kangsuhyun-yanolja
Do we have our own data on how much each model has been exposed to testing and comparison?
It seems important for boosting user leaderboard reliability to ensure a fair distribution of model testing.
if the number of tests is relatively low compared to other leaderboards, it would be good to directly convey that the model exposure count follows a uniform distribution.
* [#25|#128] Add Llama 3.2 models and available models list
This PR adds Llama 3.2 models using DeepInfra API.
Also, it adds a list of available models to the UI to help users check what models are available.
* 002
Users currently lack the ability to see which Language Learning Models (LLMs) are included in our arena. This lack of visibility makes it difficult for users to understand the range of models they are interacting with or comparing. To enhance user awareness and engagement, it's crucial to display information about the LLM candidates available in the arena.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: