aw-awatcher: init at 0.2.7

[BhasherBEL]

Description of changes

https://github.com/2e3s/awatcher

Activity and idle watchers for activitywatch compatible with wayland and hyprland.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4066

[0x61nas]

works for me, thanks

[0x61nas]

am not sure if we need to mark it as broken on darwin if we already exclude it here. but specifying linux as the only supported platform, should be enough

[sifmelcara]

This is duplicate of #287858 (which is stalled), also here is a reference to the packaging request: #287826

@aikooo7 are you still interested in merging the PR?

[aikooo7]

Shouldn't this be in a separate commit?

[BhasherBEL]

I can split it if it's necessary

[aikooo7]

This is duplicate of #287858 (which is stalled), also here is a reference to the packaging request: #287826

@aikooo7 are you still interested in merging the PR?

My bad for being so much time out first of all.

I had indeed some stuff to do in that pr that I didn't see, my bad. Everything should be fixed now and now I am also using the latest version.

[BhasherBEL]

Feel free to merge the other PR, but it seems stale and was several versions behind. It also include the Cargo.lock, by the opposite to here.

[aikooo7]

Feel free to merge the other PR, but it seems stale and was several versions behind. It also include the Cargo.lock, by the opposite to here.

1. Thanks for callout, I did destroy the commit that I had changed to use the latest version and didn't notice it, it should be the latest version now.
2. You pull the Cargo.lock at build time, I pre-pulled it, both might exist and I am using what I saw in the rust's nixos documentation, what is the issue?

[BhasherBEL]

1. Thanks for callout, I did destroy the commit that I had changed to use the latest version and didn't notice it, it should be the latest version now.

Yup, it's perfect now, my comment was anterior to that change.

2. You pull the Cargo.lock at build time, I pre-pulled it, both might exist and I am using what I saw in the rust's nixos documentation, what is the issue?

I can agree with you and did that at first, but I changed due to a comment.

To be honest I don't really care which PR is merged, but I would love to see this package in nixpkgs, so if it's faster with your PR, I'm in.

[BhasherBEL]

Closed in favor of #287858, which is now more up to date.